Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the central guardians of immune tolerance, safeguarding against autoimmune and inflammatory damage through Foxp3-dependent transcriptional programs. Recent breakthroughs in precision immunotherapy have revived interest in low-dose interleukin-2 (Ld-IL-2), a cytokine-based strategy that selectively expands and activates Tregs via the high-affinity IL-2 receptor (CD25). This review summarizes emerging mechanistic insights into how Ld-IL-2 orchestrates multilevel immune rebalancing and highlights its translational progress from molecular engineering to clinical applications across autoimmune diseases. We integrated recent findings from cellular, metabolic, and systems immunology studies, together with our own multi-center clinical trial data, to outline the dynamic networks linking IL-2 signaling, Treg plasticity, and immune homeostasis. Ld-IL-2 exerts a dose-dependent biphasic effect on the immune system, selectively enhancing Treg survival and function while restraining pathogenic Th17, Tfh, and Teff subsets. Beyond classical STAT5-FOXP3 activation, recent studies reveal that IL-2 reprograms Treg metabolism toward oxidative phosphorylation, stabilizes Foxp3 epigenetic landscapes, and coordinates intercellular communication through exosomal and tissue-resident networks. Innovations in topologically engineered IL-2 variants and sustained-release delivery systems (e.g., polylactic-acid microsphere–exosome composites) further extend the precision and durability of Treg-directed therapy. Clinical evidence from SLE, Sjögren's disease, and relapsing polychondritis confirms robust immune restoration and favorable safety profiles within defined dose windows. By selectively activating the Treg axis and reprogramming immune homeostasis, low-dose IL-2 represents a paradigm for precision immunotherapy. Integrating molecular engineering and targeted delivery strategies will enable next-generation cytokine therapies to achieve durable immune tolerance across autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

Keywords: Regulatory T cells; Low-dose Interleukin-2; Foxp3; Immune tolerance; Precision immunotherapy; Translational medicine

Introduction

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was first identified in 1976 as a potent T-cell growth factor that sustains clonal expansion of activated lymphocytes and fuels effector immunity [1]. During the early decades of cytokine research, IL-2 was considered primarily as a molecule that amplifies cytotoxic T-cell and natural killer (NK) cell activity, leading to its clinical application in high-dose regimens for metastatic cancer and chronic viral infection [2]. However, the subsequent identification of a distinct CD4+T cell subset expressing high levels of the IL-2 receptor α-chain (CD25) and the transcription factor Forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3) challenged this view. These cells—now known as regulatory T cells (Tregs)—were shown to depend critically on IL-2 for their development, survival, and suppressive function [3]. This paradigm shift transformed IL-2 from a mere activator of immune responses into a master regulator of immune tolerance.

In the decades since Shimon Sakaguchi and colleagues defined Tregs as essential for preventing spontaneous autoimmunity, IL-2 has emerged as the key cytokine linking effector and regulatory immunity [4]. Whereas high-dose IL-2 promotes effector proliferation through intermediate-affinity βγ (CD122/CD132) receptor signaling, low-dose IL-2 (Ld-IL-2) preferentially engages the high-affinity αβγ (CD25/CD122/CD132) receptor complex that is constitutively expressed on Tregs [5-6]. This receptor hierarchy provides a unique therapeutic window in which Ld-IL-2 selectively expands and stabilizes Tregs without activating pathogenic effector T cells or inducing generalized inflammation. Previous experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated robust Treg reconstitution and immune restoration across autoimmune conditions such as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren's disease (SjD), type 1 diabetes, and graft-versus-host disease [7-10].

Despite great advances in molecular immunology, treatment of autoimmune diseases still largely relies on broad immunosuppressive agents—glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors, or cytotoxic drugs—that indiscriminately suppress both protective and pathogenic immunity. Although these regimens can alleviate symptoms, their long-term administration is associated with infection risk, metabolic toxicity, and incomplete disease remission. More importantly, they fail to address the underlying immune dysregulation characterized by the numerical and functional decline of Tregs and the overactivation of effector T cells. Thus, the unmet clinical requirement lies in restoring the physiological immune balance rather than merely dampening immune activation. Targeted Treg restoration through cytokine modulation represents a rational and biologically precise strategy to achieve this goal.

Consequently, the therapeutic strategy of "precision immunorebalancing" has been proposed. This approach aims to restore immune homeostasis by selectively modulating the immune system at cellular, molecular, and tissue levels. Ld-IL2 preferentially activates high-affinity receptors on Tregs to induce tolerance without global immunosuppression. Numerous researches revealed that its efficacy stems not only from Treg expansion but also from a fundamental reprogramming of Treg metabolism, epigenome, and transcriptome, which reinforces their suppressor identity and simultaneously attenuates Th17 and Tfh pathways. Additional modulation of NK and memory CD8⁺ T cells further contributed to immune homeostasis. Translationally, engineered IL-2 variants with extended half-life and controlled receptor selectivity, along with sustained-release delivery systems such as polylactic-acid microspheres or exosome-based nanocarriers, are further enhancing the precision and durability of Treg-targeted therapy.

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanistic underpinnings of Treg-centered IL-2 signaling and summarize recent translational advances that position Ld-IL-2 as a cornerstone of next-generation precision immunotherapy. By integrating molecular biology, systems immunology, and clinical evidence, we aim to delineate how IL-2 has evolved from a classic immunostimulant to a fine-tuned regulator of immune tolerance, opening new avenues for durable disease remission across autoimmune and inflammatory disorders.

Molecular Mechanisms of IL-2-Mediated Treg Regulation

IL-2 Receptor Signaling and the STAT5–FOXP3 Axis
The biological effects of IL-2 are determined by the composition and affinity of its trimeric receptor complex (Figure 1). Tregs constitutively express the high-affinity IL-2 receptor, composed of α (CD25), β (CD122), and γ (CD132) chains, enabling them to respond to picomolar concentrations of the cytokine [5]. In contrast, conventional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express only the intermediate-affinity βγ complex, which requires much higher IL-2 levels for activation [11-12]. This receptor hierarchy forms the molecular foundation for the selective responsiveness of Tregs to low-dose IL-2 (Ld-IL-2).

Figure 1. Mechanistic network of low-dose IL-2 in immune regulation. Low-dose IL-2 preferentially signals through the high-affinity IL-2 receptor (IL-2Rαβγ) on regulatory T cells, engaging JAK–STAT and mTOR–AMPK signaling. These pathways sustain Foxp3 transcription and reprogram cellular metabolism, thereby stabilizing Treg identity and function. The resulting network suppresses Th17 and Tfh responses while maintaining CD8+ T and NK cell homeostasis, collectively restoring immune balance.

Upon IL-2 binding, JAK1 and JAK3 associated with CD122 and CD132 are activated, leading to phosphorylation of STAT5 [13-16]. Dimerized STAT5 translocates into the nucleus to bind FOXP3 and its enhancer regions, thereby reinforcing the transcriptional program that sustains Treg identity [17]. Concomitantly, PI3K–AKT and MAPK pathways undergo transient activation, delivering metabolic and pro-survival signals without converting Tregs into effector cells [18]. In contrast, excessive AKT activation—as induced by high-dose IL-2—can destabilize FOXP3 expression, highlighting the critical role of a controlled signaling amplitude [16].

FOXP3 acts as the lineage-defining transcription factor that suppresses pro-inflammatory genes while promoting immunosuppressive mediators such as IL-10, TGF-β, and CTLA-4 [19-20]. Phosphorylated STAT5 not only initiates FOXP3 transcription but also maintains its epigenetic accessibility through recruitment of histone acetyltransferases [21]. Recent multi-omics analyses show that sustained, low-intensity STAT5 signaling preserves FOXP3 stability, whereas intermittent or excessive activation promotes Treg plasticity and loss of function [22]. Thus, Ld-IL-2 achieves an optimal signal-strength threshold that sustains suppressive potency while avoiding effector conversion.

Moreover, IL-2 signaling influences the composition of the Treg pool. Peripheral IL-2 availability regulates the balance between thymus-derived Tregs and peripherally induced Tregs (pTregs), both essential for maintaining tolerance [23]. Through up-regulation of B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and down-regulation of pro-apoptotic Bim, IL-2 prolongs Treg survival and enhances their tissue persistence [24-25]. Collectively, these findings underscore that IL-2 is not merely a growth factor but the master regulator orchestrating Treg lineage commitment, stability, and homeostatic renewal.

Epigenetic and Metabolic Reprogramming of Tregs
In addition to the canonical receptor signaling, IL-2 emerges as a critical regulator of the epigenetic and metabolic programs that determine Treg identity. At the chromatin level, Ld-IL-2 maintains demethylation of the Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) within the FOXP3 locus, which is the hallmark of stable, suppressive Tregs [26-29]. This demethylated configuration is stabilized by STAT5, which promotes the recruitment of TET demethylases and suppresses DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity, preventing the loss of FOXP3 expression under inflammatory conditions [30-32]. Single-cell ATAC-seq studies further reveal that IL-2 stimulation increases chromatin accessibility at genomic loci encoding critical Treg functional molecules, including IL2RA, CTLA4, and IKZF2 (Helios), reinforcing the transcriptional network sustaining Treg lineage fidelity [18, 33-35].

Metabolically, IL-2 signaling coordinates the balance between oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and glycolysis, a pivotal determinant of Treg function. In contrast to effector T cells that rely heavily on aerobic glycolysis, Tregs prefer fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial respiration to support long-term survival and suppressive capacity [36-37]. Through controlled activation of the PI3K–AKT–mTOR axis, Ld-IL-2 enhances fatty-acid oxidation while limiting anabolic glycolysis [38]. Simultaneously, IL-2 up-regulates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), promoting mitochondrial biogenesis and reactive-oxygen-species (ROS) detoxification [39-40]. Together, this IL-2-driven metabolic reprogramming enables Tregs to adapt to nutrient-poor or hypoxic microenvironments, which are frequently encountered in chronically inflamed tissues.

IL-2 signaling integrates with cellular metabolism to regulate the availability of epigenetic substrates, notably within one-carbon metabolism, which generates the universal methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) [41-42]. This crosstalk ensures a sufficient supply of methyl-donor for sustaining FOXP3 chromatin marks [43]. Perturbation of this loop, for instance through mTOR hyperactivation or glucose overload, results in FOXP3 instability and Treg dysfunction [18, 44]. These insights explain why Ld-IL-2, but not higher doses, consistently promotes the expansion of functionally stable and long-lived Tregs.

Recent proteomic studies further indicate that IL-2 induces a shift toward an anti-inflammatory secretome, including soluble CD25 and adenosine-generating enzymes (CD39/CD73) [45]. Such extracellular metabolites contribute to a tolerogenic microenvironment that suppresses the activation of bystander effector T cells and antigen-presenting cell activation. Hence, IL-2 not only controls the intracellular transcriptional and metabolic programs of Tregs but also directs the remodeling of the extracellular immunological landscape, establishing a multilayered network of immune regulation.

Tissue Residency and Exosomal Communication
Emerging evidence indicates that IL-2 signaling extends beyond systemic immune regulation to spatially confined tissue microenvironments [46]. Tissue-resident Tregs (TR-Tregs) in non-lymphoid organs including salivary gland, lung, skin, and skeletal muscle exhibit distinct transcriptomic signatures characterized by high IL2RA and IL1RL1 (ST2) expression. These TR-Tregs not only suppress inflammation but also participate in tissue repair through secretion of amphiregulin and growth factors [47-50]. The density and functional activity of TR-Tregs are critically dependent on local IL-2 availability, which can be derived from tissue dendritic cells, natural killer (NK) cells, or exogenous low-dose IL-2 therapy. In murine models of Sjögren's-like exocrinopathy and arthritis, targeted delivery of IL-2 to glandular or joint tissues enhances Treg accumulation, reduces Th17 infiltration, and restores tissue integrity [51-53], highlighting the therapeutic potential of spatially restricted cytokine modulation.

A novel mechanism of IL-2-mediated communication involves extracellular vesicles (EVs) and exosomes. Activated T cells and stromal cells can package IL-2 and IL-2 receptor subunits into exosomes, forming a localized cytokine delivery system that extends the half-life and range of IL-2 signaling. Furthermore, Treg-derived exosomes carry immunoregulatory molecules such as CTLA-4, LAG-3, and miRNAs (miR-155, miR-21) that further suppress effector responses [54-56]. Recent studies suggest that Ld-IL-2 treatment enhances the production of these Treg exosomes, which can be detected in peripheral circulation and correlate with clinical remission in autoimmune diseases [57-60]. Such findings open a new dimension of intercellular communication where IL-2 not only acts as a soluble cytokine but also as a cargo within vesicular networks shaping the immune micro-environment.

These insights into tissue-specific IL-2 biology are informing the development of next-generation therapeutic formulations. Engineered delivery systems such as biomaterial-based slow-release microspheres and exosome-hybrid nanocarriers can deliver IL-2 directly to inflamed sites, maintaining effective local concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure [61]. This approach recapitulates the natural activity of IL-2 within tissue niches and enhances the functional persistence of resident Treg populations. Together, these mechanistic insights demonstrate that Ld-IL-2 acts not as a simple proliferative molecule but as a multidimensional signal integrating receptor affinity, epigenetic stability, metabolic fitness, and tissue-specific microenvironmental context to achieve precise immune rebalancing.

Systemic and Cellular Effects Beyond Tregs

The therapeutic efficacy of Ld-IL2 is initiated by its high-affinity binding to Tregs but culminates in the systemic recalibration of immunity. This stems from a coordinated reprogramming of the immune landscape, inhibiting effector T-cell and B-cell responses, while simultaneously regulating the homeostasis of innate and cytotoxic lymphocytes. The following discussion details how Ld-IL-2 integrates these multi-cellular processes to re-establish systemic immune tolerance (Table 1).

The Treg–Th17/Tfh Counter-regulatory Axis
The pathogenesis of autoimmune inflammation frequently involves a dysregulated balance between immunosuppressive regulatory T (Treg) cells and pathogenic T helper 17 (Th17) and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells. Th17 cells produce IL-17A, IL-21 and GM-CSF, driving tissue infiltration and neutrophil recruitment, whereas Tfh cells promote B-cell activation and autoantibody production [62-64]. The reciprocal relationship among these subsets is strongly regulated by interleukin-2 (IL-2) signaling.

At the molecular level, IL-2 serves as a potent negative regulator of Th17 and Tfh differentiation. Low dose of IL-2 selectively activates STAT5, which competitively antagonizes STAT3 at key genomic loci, including the promoters of IL17A and the Tfh master regulator BCL6, thereby suppressing the transcriptional programs for inflammatory cytokines and Tfh lineage genes [65-67]. Consequently, Ld-IL-2 not only promotes Treg stability but also actively constrains the differentiation of Th17 and Tfh lineages. This dual mechanism yields a synergistic anti-inflammatory effect: Treg-derived IL-10 and TGF-β suppress residual Th17 activity, while the concomitant reduction in Tfh-derived IL-21 reduces B-cell stimulation and autoantibody generation [68-69].

Clinical and pre-clinical evidence consistently support this mechanistic framework. In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren's disease (SjD), Ld-IL-2 therapy consistently increases circulating Treg numbers while concomitantly reducing the frequencies of Th17 and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, resulting in improvements in disease activity [8-9, 70-71]. Corresponding observations in various mouse models demonstrate that these changes correlate with suppressed germinal center reactions and decreased autoantibody titers [72-73]. Thus, by modulating the Treg–Th17/Tfh axis, Ld-IL-2 effectively redirects the adaptive immune response from a pathogenic inflammatory state toward controlled tolerance.

The suppression of Th17/Tfh pathways exhibits a clear dose-dependency. At an optimal low dose (approximately 1 million IU), IL-2 robustly expands the Treg compartment without significantly activating effector T cells (Teffs) [7, 60, 74]. In contrast, higher doses (> 3 M IU) can lead to the partial activation of effector pathways, reflecting the biphasic response to IL-2 that has been documented in clinical dose-related studies [10]. Therefore, precise dose decision is essential to retain the desired balance between regulatory and effector immunity.

Table 1. Differential effects of IL-2 on immune cell subsets and functional outcomes.

Cell Subset IL-2 Receptor Expression Response to Low-dose IL-2 Functional Effect Impact on Immune Homeostasis
Treg (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+) CD25 high CD122+ CD132+ Strong activation (↑ STAT5) ↑ Suppressive cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β) Restores tolerance
Teff (CD4+ effector) CD25 low Minimal effect ↓ IFN-γ production Reduces inflammation
Th17 CD25 low Indirect inhibition via Treg ↓ IL-17 output Prevents autoimmunity
Tfh CD25 low Suppressed ↓ B cell help Decreases autoantibody
CD8+ memory-like T CD122 high Moderate activation ↑ Cytotoxic homeostasis Enhances infection control
NK cells CD122 high ↑ Survival and cytotoxicity Balanced innate response Maintains immune surveillance

CD8+ T-cell Regulation and Memory-like Differentiation
Beyond CD4+ T cells, IL-2 also plays a crucial role in the cytotoxic compartment. Ld-IL-2 preferentially expands a distinct population of CD8+CD122+ memory-like T cells that express intermediate-affinity IL-2 receptors (CD25) [75-76]. This subset is transcriptionally defined by the concurrent upregulation of Eomesodermin (Eomes) and the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, a molecular signature that supports their long-term persistence and confers a regulated cytotoxic potential, without inducing excessive tissue damage [77-79].

Mechanistically, Ld-IL-2 engages the βγ receptor complex (CD122/CD132) on these cells to promote homeostatic proliferation and IL-10 production, contributing to the resolution of inflammation [80-82]. Furthermore, IL-2 modulates the memory differentiation pathway of CD8+ cells. Continuous low-level signaling via STAT5 favors a central-memory phenotype (CD62L+CCR7+) over short-lived effector cells [83-84]. This phenotype ensures a rapid but non-pathogenic response upon secondary antigen exposure, which is especially relevant for patients with chronic viral infections or immune deficiency associated with autoimmunity. Collectively, these findings illustrate how Ld-IL-2 fine-tunes the cytotoxic arm of immunity to support immune equilibrium rather than immunosuppression.

Modulation of NK Cell Activity and Innate Immunity
Natural killer (NK) cells represent a pivotal innate immune target of IL-2. Constitutively expressing the intermediate-affinity IL-2 receptor βγ complex (CD122/CD132), NK cells respond to both high- and low-dose IL-2, albeit with divergent functional consequences [85-86]. At low doses, IL-2 preferentially enhances the CD56bright regulatory NK subset that produces IL-10 and modulates antigen-presenting cells [85, 87-90]. These cells exhibit reduced cytotoxic activity but increased immunoregulatory potential, providing an additional layer of immune control.

Experimental studies show that Ld-IL2 upregulates the expression of inhibitory receptors such as NKG2A and CD94 on NK cells, thereby raising the threshold for activation and preventing excessive cytolytic activity, while preserving critical antiviral functions like interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) secretion [91-92]. This "calibrated activation" state supports tissue repair and homeostasis as high-dose IL-2 triggers the expansion of CD56dim cytolytic NK cells, which can exacerbate tissue damage and cytokine toxicity [93]. Thus, the NK cell response mirrors the dose-dependent duality of IL-2 seen in T cells.

Furthermore, IL-2 indirectly modulates innate immunity through Treg-educated mechanisms. Tregs expanded by Ld-IL-2 secrete copious amounts of IL-10 and TGF-β, which skew macrophage polarization toward an M2-like, tissue-reparative phenotype and restrain the pro-inflammatory capacity of dendritic cells [94-95]. This cascade establishes a positive feedback loop in which innate cells further support Treg maintenance and local IL-2 availability, stabilizing the immunological microenvironment.

Such innate re-education may explain the clinically favorable infection profile associated with Ld-IL-2 therapy. Unlike broad-spectrum immunosuppressants which increase susceptibility to opportunistic infections, Ld-IL-2 has not been linked to elevated infection rates in clinical trials [73, 96-98]. It enhances mucosal barrier immunity and NK-mediated viral clearance. These observations underscore that precision cytokine therapy can restore tolerance without compromising host defense.

Integrated Network of Immune Homeostasis
Ld-IL2 develops a coordinated recalibration of the immune system by engaging regulatory T cells (Tregs), effector T cells, cytotoxic lymphocytes, and innate subsets within an integrated network of homeostatic control [99]. Rather than acting as a generalized immunosuppressant, Ld-IL-2 restores a dynamic equilibrium that preserves immune surveillance while restraining autoimmunity. This fine-tuned network operates through multiple interdependent layers.

At the signaling level, regulatory T cells (Tregs) express high-affinity IL-2Rαβγ complexes, which allow them to efficiently respond to low concentrations of IL-2 and establish a hierarchical access to this cytokine [4, 16, 100]. Through this preferential capture of IL-2, Tregs act as a critical sink that shapes the cytokine landscape and modulates effector cell activation thresholds. In parallel, feedback mechanisms reinforce this dominance as Tregs secrete IL-10 and generate adenosine through the CD39/CD73 axis, suppressing effector and antigen-presenting cell (APC) activation while limiting IL-2 consumption by competing lymphocyte subsets [101]. These negative feedback loops sustain the regulatory pool and prevent exhaustion of the cytokine niche. Beyond local regulation, cross-compartmental communication connects systemic and tissue-localized tolerance programs [102]. Tregs communicate with innate immune cells via cytokines, exosomes, and metabolites, thereby synchronizing peripheral and organ-specific tolerance.

Through these integrated mechanisms, low-dose IL-2 acts as a biological "immune thermostat," recalibrating the immune set-point toward tolerance rather than non-selective suppression, in contrast to conventional immunosuppressive strategies that broadly inhibit immune activity [12].

Conceptual Implications
The systemic immunomodulatory effects of Ld-IL-2 suggest that regulatory immunity is not confined to a single cell type but arises from a dynamically integrated network of interdependent signals. Ld-IL-2 operates by coordinately stabilizing the regulatory T cell (Treg) compartment while concurrently reprogramming the function of effector T cells and innate immune populations [4, 12]. This understanding has shifted the therapeutic paradigm from cytokine replacement to cytokine re-tuning, using low and precisely calibrated doses to activate selective pathways that restore systemic balance [103].

The consistent clinical benefits observed with Ld-IL-2 across a spectrum of autoimmune diseases, from systemic lupus erythematosus to alopecia areata, provide compelling translational validation for this network-centric view of immune homeostasis [104-108]. Consequently, Ld-IL-2 is rationally viewed as the foundational therapeutic agent in the emerging discipline of precision immunorebalancing, a field dedicated to the targeted restoration of immune homeostasis rather than its broad suppression.

Clinical Translation of Low-dose IL-2 Therapy

Dose-dependent biphasic responses and therapeutic window
The translational development of Ld-IL2 is rooted in its biphasic dose-response immunobiology. Pioneering oncology studies using high-dose IL2 (> 10 MIU/day) demonstrated potent anti-tumor immunity but were hampered by severe toxicity, including vascular leak syndrome, due to excessive activation of effector T and NK cells. In contrast, experimental immunology revealed that picomolar concentrations (0.3–3 MIU) selectively expand Tregs without activating pro-inflammatory Teff activation or systemic inflammation (Figure 2) [10]. This bell-shaped relationship defines a narrow therapeutic window that is central to precision cytokine therapy [103, 109].

Figure 2. Dose-dependent biphasic effects of IL-2 on Treg cells. Low-dose IL-2 induces a selective, dose-dependent expansion of CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ Tregs through engagement of the high-affinity IL-2Rαβγ complex, with maximal response at approximately 1×106 IU. Higher doses may activate conventional T (Tconv) and NK cells, thereby diminishing Treg selectivity and shifting the immune balance toward activation.

This selective effect is mechanistically controlled by differential sensitivity to IL-2. Tregs, owing to their constitutive expression of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor α-chain (CD25) and a primed JAK-STAT signaling apparatus, activate STAT5 at concentrations 100- to 300-fold lower than those required by Teffs [110-111]. Clinically, trials comparing 1 MIU versus 3 MIU dosing confirm this principle, demonstrating that a dose of 1 MIU optimally expands Tregs and yields clinical improvement with minimal adverse events, whereas a 3 MIU dose can induce transient Teff activation and associated side effects like fatigue [8, 10, 105, 112]. Importantly, pharmacodynamic analyses further demonstrate that serum IL-2 concentrations return to baseline within hours after Ld-IL-2 administration, allowing physiologic cycling of Treg signaling without receptor desensitization.

Longitudinal data reveal that the degree of Treg expansion is a strong predictor of clinical efficacy, with patients achieving a doubling (≥200%) in Treg frequency typically exhibiting sustained disease remission, supporting Treg frequency as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for dose optimization [60, 71, 113]. These quantitative data provide a foundation for precision dosing models integrating IL-2 pharmacokinetics, baseline Treg status, and cytokine network feedback.

Clinical evidence across autoimmune diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
SLE represents the prototype disease in which Ld-IL2 therapy has demonstrated consistent efficacy. Multiple open-label and randomized trials have reported significant improvements in SLEDAI scores accompanied by marked Treg expansion. In our multicenter double-blind phase IIb trial (NCT04077684), patients receiving 1 MIU IL-2 for 5 consecutive days per cycle showed a 2.2-fold increase in Treg frequency and a mean 4-point reduction in SLEDAI after 12 weeks [8, 60, 108, 114-115]. Transcriptomic profiling revealed down-regulation of type-I interferon-responsive genes and normalization of IL-21 and CXCL13 signatures, reflecting suppression of Tfh-driven autoantibody production [72, 116]. The favorable safety profile was confirmed, with only mild adverse events (fatigue, transient erythema < 5%) and no increased infection risk.

Primary Sjögren's Disease (SjD)
In Sjögren's disease, Ld-IL-2 has shown promise as a disease-modifying therapy capable of restoring immune balance and exocrine gland function. A prospective study in 30 patients demonstrated that treatment significantly increased the Treg/Th17 ratio and improved unstimulated salivary flow rates following two cycles [9]. Flow cytometric analysis showed preferential expansion of CCR4+CXCR5- Tregs and reduction of circulating Tfh cells. These immunological changes were associated with clinical benefit, as evidenced by a >3-point reduction in ESSDAI scores in 70% of participants.

Relapsing Polychondritis (RP)
Relapsing polychondritis (RP), a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by steroid-dependent cartilage inflammation, presents a compelling target for Ld-IL-2 therapy [117]. In our exploratory open-label trial (n = 9), 1 MIU IL-2 for 5 days per cycle led to rapid symptom improvement within two weeks, with normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and Relapsing Polychondritis Disease Activity Index (RPDAI) scores in the majority of patients.

Type 1 Diabetes and Other Conditions
The application of Ld-IL-2 extends to other autoimmune contexts. In new-onset type 1 diabetes, therapy aims to preserve residual β-cell function, with studies showing that Ld-IL-2 can increase Treg frequency and stabilize C-peptide levels [10, 118]. Promising pilot data in autoimmune vasculitis and hepatitis further underscore its potential as a broad-spectrum immunomodulator [119-120]. Collectively, across this spectrum of diseases, Ld-IL-2 consistently achieves a quantifiable restoration of Treg populations (typically a 150–250% increase) and delivers clinically meaningful disease amelioration with a minimal toxicity profile.

Safety and tolerability profile
The collective safety data from over 600 patients treated with Ld-IL-2 worldwide reveal an exceptionally favorable profile (Table 2). The most common adverse events are mild and transient, including injection-site reactions, fatigue, and mild nausea, with an incidence generally below 10%. Critically, no grade ≥2 cytokine-release syndrome or treatment-related serious infections have been consistently reported, and routine laboratory parameters (e.g., hepatic and renal function) remain stable. Immune monitoring confirms that Ld-IL-2 does not compromise protective immunity, as evidenced by preserved antiviral NK-cell function and vaccine responses [121]. These results contrast with those of conventional immunosuppressants and underscore the fundamental distinction between precise immune recalibration and generalized immunosuppression.

Innovative formulations and delivery strategies
Topologically engineered IL-2 variants
Advances in protein engineering have yielded a newly developed IL-2 variant designed to achieve superior cellular selectivity[122-124]. These molecules are engineered by our group to retain high affinity for the CD25 (IL-2Rα) subunit while attenuating binding to CD122 (IL-2Rβ), thereby favoring signaling through the high-affinity receptor complex predominantly expressed on Tregs. This design not only enhances Treg selectivity but also often extends serum half-life, mitigating the need for frequent dosing. Preclinical studies with such variants have demonstrated sustained Treg expansion for over five days, positioning them as promising second-generation candidates for long-acting immune recalibration.

Sustained-release biomaterial platforms
To address the inherently short plasma half-life of native IL-2, significant efforts have been directed toward developing sustained-release delivery systems. Biodegradable polylactic-acid (PLA) microspheres can encapsulate IL-2 and provide controlled release of the bioactive cytokine over 72 to 96 hours, maintaining stable, physiologic concentrations and avoiding the peaks associated with toxicity[125]. Further sophistication is achieved by combining these microspheres with Treg-targeting exosomes to create hybrid complexes, which can facilitate the targeted delivery of IL-2 to inflamed tissues such as salivary glands or joints. This approach achieves localized Treg reconstitution and tissue repair with negligible systemic exposure. Pre-clinical data demonstrate marked reduction of inflammatory cell infiltration and enhanced tissue integrity in models of Sjögren-like syndrome and arthritis.

Localized delivery and minimally invasive routes
Given the emerging importance of tissue-resident Tregs, local subcutaneous or periglandular administration is being explored. Preliminary clinical studies from our group indicate that parotid region micro-injection achieves regional Treg accumulation and amelioration of glandular inflammation in SjD patients. Such approaches leverage physiological IL-2 gradients within tissue niches and hold the potential to reduce systemic dose requirements. Together, these formulation and delivery innovations represent the translational frontier of precision cytokine therapy.

Table 2. Major clinical trials and observational studies of low-dose IL-2 in autoimmune diseases.

Disease Study Type / Year Sample Size Dose (million IU) / Schedule Clinical Outcome Safety Profile
SLE Double-blind RCT [8] (NCT02465580 and NCT02932137) 60 1×every other day for 2 weeks and followed by a 2-week break /cycle Improved SRI-4 response rate Lower incidence of infection
SLE Multicenter Phase II RCT [108] (NCT02955615) 100 1.5 daily × 5 days, then weekly SLEDAI −5.1; reduced flares Transient fatigue (5%)
SLE Ongoing Phase II (Unpublished; NCT04077684) 80 0.2–1 dose every other day × 12 weeks, then weekly for 12 weeks Improved SRI-4 response Well tolerated
pSS Randomized trial [9] 30 1×every other day for 2 weeks and followed by a 2-week break /cycle ESSDAI −3 No serious AEs and lower infection risk
RP Pilot RCT (Unpublished; NCT04077736) 10 1 × 5 days, then weekly RPDAI −9; No AEs
T1DM DIL T1D trial (NCT01827735) [112] 40 0.04×10⁶ to 1.5×10⁶ IU/m² daily Increases in Treg frequencies None reported
T1DM Phase I/II RCT (DILfrequency, NCT01353833) [10] 24 0.3–3 × 5 days, adaptive dosing ↑ β-cell function; ↓ HbA1c no serious AEs
GVHD open-label (NCT01517347) [152] 90 1.0 × 10⁶ IU/m² daily× 14 days Minimal residual disease-positive None reported
GVHD observational cohort (NCT00529035) [7] 29 0.3/1/3× 10⁶ IU/m² × 8 weeks preferential, sustained Treg cell expansion None reported
Alzheimer's disease Phase 2a RCT (NCT06096090) [153] 38 1.0 × 10⁶ IU/day×21 weeks CSF Aβ42 levels ↑ None reported
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis MIROCALS study (NCT03039673) [154] 304 2 × 10⁶ IU/day× 5 days Decrease in risk of death No serious AEs
Bullous pemphigoid Perspective study (ChiCTR2000028707) [97] 43 half million IU every other day × 8 weeks Shorter disease control time No serious infections

Biomarkers and precision monitoring
The translational development of Ld-IL2 has been greatly facilitated by the evolution of quantitative immunomonitoring assays. Flow cytometric measurement of CD25+CD127low FOXP3+ Tregs remains the gold-standard biomarker, but emerging omics approaches providing unprecedented resolution [126-127]. Single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing have identified distinct Treg clonotypes expanding after therapy, while epigenetic analyses of FOXP3 locus demethylation (e.g., TSDR methylation status) allow for longitudinal tracking of Treg lineage stability [128-130]. Circulating exosomal IL-2 and microRNA signatures (miR-155, miR-21) correlate with clinical response and may serve as minimally invasive surrogate biomarkers [131]. The integration of these multidimensional data into AI-driven models is poised to enable personalized dose optimization and prediction of long-term treatment efficacy.

Comparative advantages over traditional immunosuppression
Ld-IL-2 possesses distinct mechanistic and clinical advantages over conventional broad-spectrum immunosuppressants. Unlike these agents, which non-specifically inhibit lymphocyte activation or proliferation, Ld-IL-2 acts by selectively regulating the immune system. This mechanistic precision underlies several distinct clinical advantages as Ld-IL2 restored physiological tolerance through a normalized Treg-to-effector T cell balance and preserved antimicrobial immunity stemming from maintained NK and memory CD8+ T cell activity. The re-establishment of a stable immune set-point underpins the potential for achieving drug-free remission in certain individuals. These distinctive properties collectively position Ld-IL-2 not as a mere immunosuppressant, but as a pioneering agent for immune reconstruction.

Future perspectives in translational design
The future trajectory of Ld-IL-2 therapy lies in the development of integrated platforms that synergize engineered cytokine variants, advanced biomaterial-based delivery systems, and digital immunomonitoring (Figure 3 and Table 3). Multi-omics profiling can define patient-specific immune signatures that predict responsiveness to IL-2. Strategic combinations of Ld-IL-2 with other immunomodulators [75, 96, 132-134] including JAK inhibitors, microbiome-derived metabolites, or belimumab may achieve synergistic efficacy by concurrently targeting complementary pathways. Ultimately, the goal is to develop a personalized immunotherapy ecosystem where cytokine dosing is dynamically optimized based on real-time immune feedback, thereby transforming Ld-IL-2 from a disease-specific intervention into a universal platform for restoring immune homeostasis across autoimmunity, chronic inflammation, and transplantation medicine.

Figure 3. Engineered IL-2 variants and targeted delivery strategies. (A) Topological Engineered IL2 Variants. Rational IL2 mutation to reduce IL-2Rβ affinity while preserving IL-2Rα binding, achieving CD25-biased agonists with enhanced Treg selectivity, prolonged half-life, and higher stability. (B) Targeted Delivery for Sustained Release. A hybrid nanoparticle platform combining PLA microspheres and exosomes enables designed for controlled IL-2 release, maintaining therapeutic concentrations within the selective window. (C) Tissue-Selective Immunomodulation. Local injection including salivary, gland and joint concentrates IL-2 at sites of inflammation, maximizing Treg enrichment and resulting in reduced inflammation with limited systemic toxicity.

Table 3. Summary of engineered IL-2 variants and delivery systems.

Approach Design Feature Mechanistic Advantage Pre-clinical Outcome Translational Potential
Topological engineered IL-2 Reduced CD122 binding, retained CD25 affinity Enhanced Treg selectivity Prolonged half-life (> 48 h) Phase I preparation
PEGylated IL-2 [122] PEG chain modification Reduced renal clearance Improved AUC × 3 Safety proven
IL2-4M-PEG [155] Substitute amino acids and implement site-directed PEGylation reduced CD25 binding activity and an extended half-life Amplify effector cells Enhance combined cancer therapies
IL-2/anti-IL-2 complex Transient complex with anti-IL-2 mAb Directed Treg bias ↑ Treg/Teff ratio Translatable
Pegylated rhIL-2 (SAR444336) [156] Site-specifically pegylated form enhanced PK and induced Tregs reduced stimulation of off-target effector T and NK cells Reduced inflammation in a delayed-type hypersensitivity model
PD1-IL2v [61] Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins Expansion of CD8+ and Tconv cells ↑ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells Next-generation immunocytokines
PLA microsphere system [157] Slow-release (>72h) Sustained serum level Stable Treg expansion Ready for pilot test
IL-2 mutein [158] Fc-fused homodimer reduced potency and enhanced Treg cell selectivity Preferential Treg cell enrichment Strong future potential
Exosome nanocarrier Natural membrane vector Targeted tissue delivery Localized immunomodulation Strong future potential

Treg modification and clinical practice

Maintaining long-term Treg stability
The durability of Treg-mediated immune tolerance depends on the sustained expression and epigenetic stability of FOXP3. Under inflammatory or metabolic stress, Tregs can undergo functional reprogramming—often termed "Treg plasticity"—characterized by loss of FOXP3 expression and acquisition of pro-inflammatory, effector-like properties [135-136]. In chronic autoimmune diseases, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α contribute to this instability by disrupting STAT5 signaling and modifying the chromatin landscape at the FOXP3 locus, thereby impairing its transcription [137]. Consequently, a subset of expanded Tregs may adopt pathogenic effector or Th17-like phenotypes, ultimately compromising the durability of therapeutic responses.

To address this challenge, several strategies are under exploration. Optimized dosing regimens, such as periodic administration of Ld-IL-2, may better support Treg lineage stability than continuous exposure, as intermittent pulses mimic physiological cytokine exposure [8, 59, 70]. Combining Ld-IL-2 with therapies that reinforce FOXP3 stability—such as low-dose rapamycin, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, or metabolic modulators targeting the AMPK-mTOR pathway—has shown synergistic effects in preclinical studies. Advances in synthetic biology also allow enforced FOXP3 expression or CRISPR-mediated editing of important enhancer regions to generate functionally stabilized Treg cells. These engineered cellular therapies, while technically demanding, hold promise for achieving durable immune tolerance that persists beyond transient cytokine stimulation.

Inter-individual variability and biomarker-guided precision dosing
Substantial inter-individual heterogeneity in response to standardized Ld-IL2 regimens has emerged as a key challenge in the clinic. This variability is influenced by genetic and immunological factors, including polymorphisms in genes such as IL2RA, STAT5B, and PTPN2, which can alter IL-2 receptor sensitivity and downstream signaling fidelity [138-141]. Furthermore, baseline immunological responses including the frequency and activation state of regulatory T cells (Tregs) vary considerably across different autoimmune diseases, contributing to divergent therapeutic outcomes [7, 106, 109].

Addressing this variability requires the development of quantitative biomarkers for real-time dose adjustment. The Treg/Teff ratio and absolute Treg counts serve as practical, short-term pharmacodynamic markers. These include the analysis of FOXP3 Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) methylation status, measurement of serum IL-2 trough levels, and assessment of phospho-STAT5 induction dynamics in responsive cell populations. Integrating these measurements into algorithm-driven dosing models could enable personalized treatment cycles that maintain each patient within their optimal "immune tolerance window." Ultimately, artificial intelligence platforms that synthesize longitudinal immunophenotyping, cytokine pharmacokinetics, and clinical data are expected to make precision dosing a practical reality.

Optimization of cytokine delivery and tissue targeting
The therapeutic application of native interleukin-2 (IL-2) is constrained by its rapid clearance from plasma, with a half-life of merely 5-10 minutes, and its non-specific tissue distribution. These properties limit its efficacy in autoimmune conditions where pathology is confined to specific organs. A central objective in the field is, therefore, to achieve sustained, localized cytokine exposure while minimizing systemic diffusion and associated off-target effects. Innovative biomaterial-based delivery systems offer a promising strategy to overcome these limitations. Platforms such as poly (lactic acid) (PLA) microspheres, hydrogel depots, and exosome-hybrid nanocarriers are designed to provide controlled release of IL-2, thereby extending its in vivo bioavailability, reducing the frequency of administration, and facilitating enhanced accumulation at target sites [142-143].

A more advanced approach involves the development of formulations engineered for local activity within particular organs [144]. Periglandular injection of microsphere-encapsulated IL-2 has been shown to enrich Tregs locally and restore salivary function in models of Sjögren's disease, while intra-articular delivery holds potential for managing rheumatoid arthritis by modulating the joint microenvironment [145-147]. Combining spatial targeting with molecular engineering like topological IL-2 variants exhibiting selective CD25 binding could maximize therapeutic precision and minimize systemic effects [124]. The successful clinical translation of these sophisticated bio-engineered biologics will be closely tied to the ongoing evolution of regulatory frameworks tailored to assess their unique profiles.

Balancing immune tolerance and host defense
An inherent challenge of all immunomodulatory strategies is preserving protective immunity while inducing tolerance. Although clinical trials have not reported increased infection rates with Ld-IL-2, long-term surveillance is warranted, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Maintaining the functional capacity of natural killer (NK) cell and memory CD8+ T cell activity is crucial for robust antiviral and anti-tumor surveillance [76, 77, 82, 86]. Future therapeutic protocols could incorporate adaptive dosing strategies informed by real-time biomarkers of these effector functions, such as NK cell interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production or CD8+T cell granzyme B levels, to dynamically ensure that host defense remains uncompromised.

In parallel, the interplay between Ld-IL-2 and other immunotherapeutic modalities, such as vaccination and cancer immunotherapy, presents a compelling area for future investigation [4]. Emerging evidence suggests that intermittent Ld-IL2 could enhance vaccine responses by preserving immune memory, while engineered IL-2 antagonists or dual-function molecules may allow temporal toggling between tolerance and activation depending on clinical context [124].

Integrating multi-omics and system immunology
The complexity of IL-2 signaling networks calls for comprehensive multi-omics approaches to fully delineate its impact on the immune system. Single-cell transcriptomics, chromatin accessibility mapping, and proteomics have already delineated the cellular heterogeneity of Treg and Teff subsets responding to Ld-IL-2 [148]. Integrating these datasets with metabolomic profiles and microbiome analysis will yield a more holistic understanding of the cytokine-induced remodeling of immune homeostasis. Subsequently, systems immunology frameworks can leverage this integrated information to identify predictive molecular modules associated with clinical response and resistance, thereby informing the development of rational combination therapies and novel biomarker discovery [149].

This systems-level insight paves the way for rationally designed combination strategies. As co-administration of Ld-IL-2 with microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids, which are known to promote Treg generation and function through epigenetic and metabolic mechanisms, could synergistically enhance immune tolerance [150]. Similarly, combining Ld-IL-2 with agents that neutralize type I interferon signaling may suppress the inflammatory condition that undermines Treg stability in certain autoimmune diseases [151]. Such "rational combination immunotherapies" embody the principle of precision immunorebalancing, aiming to recalibrate entire pathological networks rather than isolated targets.

Future design of next-generation IL-2 therapeutics
The future of IL-2-based therapy is set to be defined by the convergence of advanced protein engineering, computational design, and intelligent delivery. Next-generation IL-2 variants are being engineered with structural modifications that precisely control receptor subunit bias—favoring CD25 for Treg selectivity—while simultaneously improving pharmacokinetic profiles and enabling effective signaling at near-physiological concentrations. Conjugation with antibody fragments or Fc domains may extend half-life, while fusion with targeting moieties (e.g., chemokine receptors, integrins) could direct cytokine activity to inflamed tissues.

Beyond protein modifications, novel delivery platforms using programmable RNA or DNA vectors encoding the IL-2 sequence present a transformative approach. These systems could enable endogenous, in vivo production of the cytokine under the regulation of tunable promoters, offering a pathway for sustained yet reversible immune modulation. The ultimate integration of these sophisticated molecular tools with biocompatible delivery systems and real-time immune monitoring is poised to give rise to a new class of "smart cytokines," capable of dynamically adapting their activity to the evolving immunological state of the patient.

Conclusion

Low-dose IL-2 has transformed from a conventional cytokine into precision immunomodulation, demonstrating that immune responses can be selectively and restoratively recalibrated rather than broadly suppressed. The coming decade will likely see this approach mature into a mainstream clinical modality. Its sustained success will rest on three critical pillars: a deepening mechanistic understanding of Treg biology, relentless technological innovation in cytokine design and delivery, and the implementation of data-driven personalization strategies. By systematically addressing the remaining challenges including stability, variability, and precise tissue targeting, Ld-IL-2 has the potential to evolve from a promising biological therapy into a cornerstone of immune-tolerance medicine, reshaping therapeutic strategies across autoimmunity, transplantation, and chronic inflammatory diseases.

Abbreviations

Tregs: Regulatory T cells; pTregs: peripherally induced Tregs; TR-Tregs: Tissue-resident Tregs; Ld-IL-2: low-dose interleukin-2; NK cell: natural killer cell; Th17: T helper 17; Tfh: T follicular helper; Teffs: effector T cells; SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus; Bcl-2: B cell lymphoma 2; TSDR: Treg-specific demethylated region; DNMT: DNA methyltransferase; OXPHOS: oxidative phosphorylation; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; ROS: reactive-oxygen-species; SAM: S-adenosylmethionine; EVs: extracellular vesicles; IFN-γ: interferon-gamma; APC: antigen-presenting cell; RP: Relapsing polychondritis; CRP: C-reactive protein; RPDAI: Relapsing Polychondritis Disease Activity Index; PLA: polylactic-acid; HDAC: histone deacetylase.

Declarations

Author contributions

Ruiling Feng: writing original draft, prepare, create, or express the content for publication, especially in writing the initial draft. Bo Huang and Xia Zhang: writing review and editing, prepare, create, or express the content for publication, especially in writing the initial draft. Jing He: supervision, supervise and lead the planning and execution of research activities. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding information

This study was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFE0131700), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271835, 82071813).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

References

[1] Morgan DA, Ruscetti FW, & Gallo R. (1976). Selective in vitro growth of T lymphocytes from normal human bone marrows. Science, 193(4257), 1007-1008. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181845

[2] Rosenberg SA. (2014). IL-2: the first effective immunotherapy for human cancer. J Immunol, 192(12), 5451-5458. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1490019

[3] Hu W, Dolsten GA, Wang EY, Beroshvili G, Wang ZM, Ghelani AP, et al. (2025). Temporal and context-dependent requirements for the transcription factor Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol, 10.1038/s41590-025-02295-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-025-02295-4

[4] Boyman O, & Sprent J. (2012). The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol, 12(3), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3156

[5] Wang X, Rickert M, & Garcia KC. (2005). Structure of the quaternary complex of interleukin-2 with its alpha, beta, and gammac receptors. Science, 310(5751), 1159-1163. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1117893

[6] Overwijk WW, Tagliaferri MA, & Zalevsky J. (2021). Engineering IL-2 to Give New Life to T Cell Immunotherapy. Annu Rev Med, 72, 281-311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-073118-011031

[7] Koreth J, Matsuoka K, Kim HT, McDonough SM, Bindra B, Alyea EP, 3rd, et al. (2011). Interleukin-2 and regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 365(22), 2055-2066. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1108188

[8] He J, Zhang R, Shao M, Zhao X, Miao M, Chen J, et al. (2020). Efficacy and safety of low-dose IL-2 in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 79(1), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215396

[9] He J, Chen J, Miao M, Zhang R, Cheng G, Wang Y, et al. (2022). Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Interleukin 2 for Primary Sjögren Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open, 5(11), e2241451. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41451

[10] Hartemann A, Bensimon G, Payan CA, Jacqueminet S, Bourron O, Nicolas N, et al. (2013). Low-dose interleukin 2 in patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase 1/2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 1(4), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70113-X

[11] Mitra S, & Leonard WJ. (2018). Biology of IL-2 and its therapeutic modulation: Mechanisms and strategies. J Leukoc Biol, 103(4), 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.2ri0717-278r

[12] Abbas AK, Trotta E, D RS, Marson A, & Bluestone JA. (2018). Revisiting IL-2: Biology and therapeutic prospects. Sci Immunol, 3(25). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aat1482

[13] Johnston JA, Kawamura M, Kirken RA, Chen YQ, Blake TB, Shibuya K, et al. (1994). Phosphorylation and activation of the Jak-3 Janus kinase in response to interleukin-2. Nature, 370(6485), 151-153. https://doi.org/10.1038/370151a0

[14] Ghoreschi K, Laurence A, & O'Shea JJ. (2009). Janus kinases in immune cell signaling. Immunol Rev, 228(1), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00754.x

[15] Lin JX, Li P, Liu D, Jin HT, He J, Ata Ur Rasheed M, et al. (2012). Critical Role of STAT5 transcription factor tetramerization for cytokine responses and normal immune function. Immunity, 36(4), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.02.017

[16] Chinen T, Kannan AK, Levine AG, Fan X, Klein U, Zheng Y, et al. (2016). An essential role for the IL-2 receptor in T(reg) cell function. Nat Immunol, 17(11), 1322-1333. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3540

[17] Feng Y, van der Veeken J, Shugay M, Putintseva EV, Osmanbeyoglu HU, Dikiy S, et al. (2015). A mechanism for expansion of regulatory T-cell repertoire and its role in self-tolerance. Nature, 528(7580), 132-136. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16141

[18] Ise W, Kohyama M, Nutsch KM, Lee HM, Suri A, Unanue ER, et al. (2010). CTLA-4 suppresses the pathogenicity of self antigen-specific T cells by cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic mechanisms. Nat Immunol, 11(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1835

[19] Zheng Y, Josefowicz SZ, Kas A, Chu TT, Gavin MA, & Rudensky AY. (2007). Genome-wide analysis of Foxp3 target genes in developing and mature regulatory T cells. Nature, 445(7130), 936-940. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05563

[20] Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T, Miyara M, Fehervari Z, et al. (2008). CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function. Science, 322(5899), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160062

[21] Yao Z, Kanno Y, Kerenyi M, Stephens G, Durant L, Watford WT, et al. (2007). Nonredundant roles for Stat5a/b in directly regulating Foxp3. Blood, 109(10), 4368-4375. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-11-055756

[22] Feng Y, Arvey A, Chinen T, van der Veeken J, Gasteiger G, & Rudensky AY. (2014). Control of the inheritance of regulatory T cell identity by a cis element in the Foxp3 locus. Cell, 158(4), 749-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.031

[23] Shevyrev D, & Tereshchenko V. (2019). Treg Heterogeneity, Function, and Homeostasis. Front Immunol, 10, 3100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03100

[24] Wang X, Szymczak-Workman AL, Gravano DM, Workman CJ, Green DR, & Vignali DA. (2012). Preferential control of induced regulatory T cell homeostasis via a Bim/Bcl-2 axis. Cell Death Dis, 3(2), e270. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2012.9

[25] Barahona de Brito C, & Patra AK. (2022). NFAT Factors Are Dispensable for the Development but Are Critical for the Maintenance of Foxp3(+) Regulatory T Cells. Cells, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091397

[26] Wieczorek G, Asemissen A, Model F, Turbachova I, Floess S, Liebenberg V, et al. (2009). Quantitative DNA methylation analysis of FOXP3 as a new method for counting regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and solid tissue. Cancer Res, 69(2), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-08-2361

[27] Chen Q, Kim YC, Laurence A, Punkosdy GA, & Shevach EM. (2011). IL-2 controls the stability of Foxp3 expression in TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ T cells in vivo. J Immunol, 186(11), 6329-6337. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1100061

[28] Bending D, Pesenacker AM, Ursu S, Wu Q, Lom H, Thirugnanabalan B, et al. (2014). Hypomethylation at the regulatory T cell-specific demethylated region in CD25hi T cells is decoupled from FOXP3 expression at the inflamed site in childhood arthritis. J Immunol, 193(6), 2699-2708. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1400599

[29] Huss DJ, Mehta DS, Sharma A, You X, Riester KA, Sheridan JP, et al. (2015). In vivo maintenance of human regulatory T cells during CD25 blockade. J Immunol, 194(1), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1402140

[30] Toker A, Engelbert D, Garg G, Polansky JK, Floess S, Miyao T, et al. (2013). Active demethylation of the Foxp3 locus leads to the generation of stable regulatory T cells within the thymus. J Immunol, 190(7), 3180-3188. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1203473

[31] Correa LO, Jordan MS, & Carty SA. (2020). DNA Methylation in T-Cell Development and Differentiation. Crit Rev Immunol, 40(2), 135-156. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2020033728

[32] Chen C, Wang Z, Ding Y, Wang L, Wang S, Wang H, et al. (2022). DNA Methylation: From Cancer Biology to Clinical Perspectives. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed), 27(12), 326. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2712326

[33] Guo C, Liu Q, Zong D, Zhang W, Zuo Z, Yu Q, et al. (2022). Single-cell transcriptome profiling and chromatin accessibility reveal an exhausted regulatory CD4+ T cell subset in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Rep, 41(6), 111606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111606

[34] Bonazzi S, d'Hennezel E, Beckwith REJ, Xu L, Fazal A, Magracheva A, et al. (2023). Discovery and characterization of a selective IKZF2 glue degrader for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Chem Biol, 30(3), 235-247.e212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.02.005

[35] Xin Y, Yang M, Zhao Z, He Z, Mei Y, Xiong F, et al. (2025). AIM2 deficiency in CD4(+) T cells promotes psoriasis-like inflammation by regulating Th17-Treg axis via AIM2-IKZF2 pathway. J Autoimmun, 150, 103351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2024.103351

[36] McDonald-Hyman C, Aguilar EG, Compeer EB, Zaiken MC, Rhee SY, Mohamed FA, et al. (2025). Acetyl-CoA carboxylase-1 inhibition increases regulatory T-Cell metabolism and graft-vs-host disease treatment efficacy via mitochondrial fusion. J Clin Invest, 10.1172/jci182480. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci182480

[37] Han J, Zhou Z, Wang H, Chen Y, Li W, Dai M, et al. (2025). Dysfunctional glycolysis-UCP2-fatty acid oxidation promotes CTLA4(int)FOXP3(int) regulatory T-cell production in rheumatoid arthritis. Mol Med, 31(1), 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-025-01372-6

[38] Feng R, Xiao X, Wang Y, Huang B, Chen J, Cheng G, et al. (2024). Metabolic impact of low dose IL-2 therapy for primary Sjögren's Syndrome in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol, 43(12), 3789-3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07165-2

[39] Duan W, Ding Y, Yu X, Ma D, Yang B, Li Y, et al. (2019). Metformin mitigates autoimmune insulitis by inhibiting Th1 and Th17 responses while promoting Treg production. Am J Transl Res, 11(4), 2393-2402.

[40] Pokhrel RH, Kang B, Timilshina M, & Chang JH. (2022). AMPK Amplifies IL2-STAT5 Signaling to Maintain Stability of Regulatory T Cells in Aged Mice. Int J Mol Sci, 23(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012384

[41] De La Rosa J, Geller AM, LeGros HL, Jr., & Kotb M. (1992). Induction of interleukin 2 production but not methionine adenosyltransferase activity or S-adenosylmethionine turnover in Jurkat T-cells. Cancer Res, 52(12), 3361-3366.

[42] Sahin E, & Sahin M. (2019). Epigenetical Targeting of the FOXP3 Gene by S-Adenosylmethionine Diminishes the Suppressive Capacity of Regulatory T Cells Ex Vivo and Alters the Expression Profiles. J Immunother, 42(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/cji.0000000000000247

[43] Field CS, Baixauli F, Kyle RL, Puleston DJ, Cameron AM, Sanin DE, et al. (2020). Mitochondrial Integrity Regulated by Lipid Metabolism Is a Cell-Intrinsic Checkpoint for Treg Suppressive Function. Cell Metab, 31(2), 422-437.e425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.021

[44] Zhang X, Wang G, Bi Y, Jiang Z, & Wang X. (2022). Inhibition of glutaminolysis ameliorates lupus by regulating T and B cell subsets and downregulating the mTOR/P70S6K/4EBP1 and NLRP3/caspase-1/IL-1β pathways in MRL/lpr mice. Int Immunopharmacol, 112, 109133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109133

[45] Deaglio S, Dwyer KM, Gao W, Friedman D, Usheva A, Erat A, et al. (2007). Adenosine generation catalyzed by CD39 and CD73 expressed on regulatory T cells mediates immune suppression. J Exp Med, 204(6), 1257-1265. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20062512

[46] Arpaia N, Green JA, Moltedo B, Arvey A, Hemmers S, Yuan S, et al. (2015). A Distinct Function of Regulatory T Cells in Tissue Protection. Cell, 162(5), 1078-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.021

[47] Zhang P, Wang J, Miao J, & Zhu P. (2025). The dual role of tissue regulatory T cells in tissue repair: return to homeostasis or fibrosis. Front Immunol, 16, 1560578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1560578

[48] Hilaire M, Mimoun A, Cagnet L, Villette R, Roubanis A, Sentenac H, et al. (2025). Neonatal regulatory T cells persist into adulthood across multiple tissues with high enrichment in the skin. Sci Adv, 11(40), eadx8037. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx8037

[49] Fallegger A, Priola M, Artola-Borán M, Núñez NG, Wild S, Gurtner A, et al. (2022). TGF-β production by eosinophils drives the expansion of peripherally induced neuropilin(-) RORγt(+) regulatory T-cells during bacterial and allergen challenge. Mucosal Immunol, 15(3), 504-514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41385-022-00484-0

[50] Zhou X, Tang J, Cao H, Fan H, & Li B. (2015). Tissue resident regulatory T cells: novel therapeutic targets for human disease. Cell Mol Immunol, 12(5), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2015.23

[51] Wang Y, Feng R, Cheng G, Huang B, Tian J, Gan Y, et al. (2022). Low Dose Interleukin-2 Ameliorates Sjögren's Syndrome in a Murine Model. Front Med (Lausanne), 9, 887354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.887354

[52] Xie F, Zhou X, Fang M, Li H, Su P, Tu Y, et al. (2019). Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer Immune Microenvironment and Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6(24), 1901779. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201901779

[53] Xia Y, Jiang H, Wang C, Liu Z, Gao H, Yu JF, et al. (2025). Treg cell-derived exosomal miR-21 promotes osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells. BMC Oral Health, 25(1), 1465. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06770-0

[54] Okoye IS, Coomes SM, Pelly VS, Czieso S, Papayannopoulos V, Tolmachova T, et al. (2014). MicroRNA-containing T-regulatory-cell-derived exosomes suppress pathogenic T helper 1 cells. Immunity, 41(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.019

[55] Rahmani M, Mohammadnia-Afrouzi M, Nouri HR, Fattahi S, Akhavan-Niaki H, & Mostafazadeh A. (2018). Human PBMCs fight or flight response to starvation stress: Increased T-reg, FOXP3, and TGF-β1 with decreased miR-21 and Constant miR-181c levels. Biomed Pharmacother, 108, 1404-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.163

[56] Gertel S, Polachek A, Elkayam O, & Furer V. (2022). Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) regulatory T cells: An evolving biomarker for treatment response in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev, 21(6), 103085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103085

[57] Ravichandran R, Itabashi Y, Fleming T, Bansal S, Bowen S, Poulson C, et al. (2022). Low-dose IL-2 prevents murine chronic cardiac allograft rejection: Role for IL-2-induced T regulatory cells and exosomes with PD-L1 and CD73. Am J Transplant, 22(9), 2180-2194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17101

[58] Churlaud G, Jimenez V, Ruberte J, Amadoudji Zin M, Fourcade G, Gottrand G, et al. (2014). Sustained stimulation and expansion of Tregs by IL2 control autoimmunity without impairing immune responses to infection, vaccination and cancer. Clin Immunol, 151(2), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2014.02.003

[59] Feng M, Guo H, Zhang C, Wang Y, Liang Z, Zhao X, et al. (2019). Absolute reduction of regulatory T cells and regulatory effect of short-term and low-dose IL-2 in polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Int Immunopharmacol, 77, 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105912

[60] Rosenzwajg M, Lorenzon R, Cacoub P, Pham HP, Pitoiset F, El Soufi K, et al. (2019). Immunological and clinical effects of low-dose interleukin-2 across 11 autoimmune diseases in a single, open clinical trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 78(2), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214229

[61] Fusi I, Serger C, Herzig P, Germann M, Sandholzer MT, Oelgarth N, et al. (2025). PD-1-targeted cis-delivery of an IL-2 variant induces a multifaceted antitumoral T cell response in human lung cancer. Sci Transl Med, 17(816), eadr3718. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.adr3718

[62] Kehry MR, Yamashita LC, & Hodgkin PD. (1990). B-cell proliferation and differentiation mediated by Th-cell membranes and lymphokines. Res Immunol, 141(4-5), 421-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-2494(90)90033-u

[63] Cen Z, Li Y, Wei B, Wu W, Huang Y, & Lu J. (2021). The Role of B Cells in Regulation of Th Cell Differentiation in Coxsackievirus B3-Induced Acute Myocarditis. Inflammation, 44(5), 1949-1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-021-01472-5

[64] Park E, & Ciofani M. (2025). Th17 cell pathogenicity in autoimmune disease. Exp Mol Med, 57(9), 1913-1927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01535-9

[65] Cheng H, Nan F, Ji N, Ma X, Zhang J, Liang H, et al. (2025). Regulatory T cell therapy promotes TGF-β and IL-6-dependent pro-inflammatory Th17 cell generation by reducing IL-2. Nat Commun, 16(1), 7644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62628-7

[66] Dold L, Kalthoff S, Frank L, Zhou T, Esser P, Lutz P, et al. (2024). STAT activation in regulatory CD4(+) T cells of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Immun Inflamm Dis, 12(4), e1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1248

[67] Kim S, Boehme L, Nel L, Casian A, Sangle S, Nova-Lamperti E, et al. (2022). Defective STAT5 Activation and Aberrant Expression of BCL6 in Naive CD4 T Cells Enhances Follicular Th Cell-like Differentiation in Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. J Immunol, 208(4), 807-818. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2001331

[68] Ballesteros-Tato A, León B, Graf BA, Moquin A, Adams PS, Lund FE, et al. (2012). Interleukin-2 inhibits germinal center formation by limiting T follicular helper cell differentiation. Immunity, 36(5), 847-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.02.012

[69] Chaudhry A, Rudra D, Treuting P, Samstein RM, Liang Y, Kas A, et al. (2009). CD4+ regulatory T cells control TH17 responses in a Stat3-dependent manner. Science, 326(5955), 986-991. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172702

[70] Rosenzwajg M, Lorenzon R, Cacoub P, Pham HP, Pitoiset F, El Soufi K, et al. (2019). Immunological and clinical effects of low-dose interleukin-2 across 11 autoimmune diseases in a single, open clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis, 78(2), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214229

[71] Miao M, Li Y, Xu D, Zhang R, He J, Sun X, et al. (2022). Therapeutic responses and predictors of low-dose interleukin-2 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 40(5), 867-871. https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/1o6pn1

[72] Rose A, von Spee-Mayer C, Kloke L, Wu K, Kühl A, Enghard P, et al. (2019). IL-2 Therapy Diminishes Renal Inflammation and the Activity of Kidney-Infiltrating CD4+ T Cells in Murine Lupus Nephritis. Cells, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101234

[73] Zhou P, Chen J, He J, Zheng T, Yunis J, Makota V, et al. (2021). Low-dose IL-2 therapy invigorates CD8+ T cells for viral control in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS Pathog, 17(10), e1009858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009858

[74] Kim N, Jeon YW, Nam YS, Lim JY, Im KI, Lee ES, et al. (2016). Therapeutic potential of low-dose IL-2 in a chronic GVHD patient by in vivo expansion of regulatory T cells. Cytokine, 78, 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2015.11.020

[75] Wang F, Wang S, He B, Liu H, Wang X, Li C, et al. (2021). Immunotherapeutic strategy based on anti-OX40L and low dose of IL-2 to prolong graft survival in sensitized mice by inducing the generation of CD4(+) and CD8(+) Tregs. Int Immunopharmacol, 97, 107663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107663

[76] Onyshchenko K, Luo R, Guffart E, Gaedicke S, Grosu AL, Firat E, et al. (2023). Expansion of circulating stem-like CD8(+) T cells by adding CD122-directed IL-2 complexes to radiation and anti-PD1 therapies in mice. Nat Commun, 14(1), 2087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37825-x

[77] Kalia V, Sarkar S, Subramaniam S, Haining WN, Smith KA, & Ahmed R. (2010). Prolonged interleukin-2Ralpha expression on virus-specific CD8+ T cells favors terminal-effector differentiation in vivo. Immunity, 32(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.11.010

[78] Shameli A, Yamanouchi J, Tsai S, Yang Y, Clemente-Casares X, Moore A, et al. (2013). IL-2 promotes the function of memory-like autoregulatory CD8+ T cells but suppresses their development via FoxP3+ Treg cells. Eur J Immunol, 43(2), 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201242845

[79] Li S, Xie Q, Zeng Y, Zou C, Liu X, Wu S, et al. (2014). A naturally occurring CD8(+)CD122(+) T-cell subset as a memory-like Treg family. Cell Mol Immunol, 11(4), 326-331. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2014.25

[80] Horwitz DA, Zheng SG, & Gray JD. (2003). The role of the combination of IL-2 and TGF-beta or IL-10 in the generation and function of CD4+ CD25+ and CD8+ regulatory T cell subsets. J Leukoc Biol, 74(4), 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0503228

[81] Minai Y, Hisatsune T, Nishijima K, Enomoto A, & Kaminogawa S. (1994). Activation via TCR or IL-2 receptor of a CD8+ suppressor T cell clone: effect on IL-10 production and on proliferation of the suppressor T cell. Cytotechnology, 14(2), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00758172

[82] Elrefaei M, Ventura FL, Baker CA, Clark R, Bangsberg DR, & Cao H. (2007). HIV-specific IL-10-positive CD8+ T cells suppress cytolysis and IL-2 production by CD8+ T cells. J Immunol, 178(5), 3265-3271. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.3265

[83] Grange M, Giordano M, Mas A, Roncagalli R, Firaguay G, Nunes JA, et al. (2015). Control of CD8 T cell proliferation and terminal differentiation by active STAT5 and CDKN2A/CDKN2B. Immunology, 145(4), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12471

[84] Qin Y, Qian Y, Zhang J, & Liu S. (2025). CD1d-Restricted NKT Cells Promote Central Memory CD8(+) T Cell Formation via an IL-15-pSTAT5-Eomes Axis in a Pathogen-Exposed Environment. Int J Mol Sci, 26(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157272

[85] Caligiuri MA. (2008). Human natural killer cells. Blood, 112(3), 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-09-077438

[86] Harris KE, Lorentsen KJ, Malik-Chaudhry HK, Loughlin K, Basappa HM, Hartstein S, et al. (2021). A bispecific antibody agonist of the IL-2 heterodimeric receptor preferentially promotes in vivo expansion of CD8 and NK cells. Sci Rep, 11(1), 10592. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90096-8

[87] Hirakawa M, Matos TR, Liu H, Koreth J, Kim HT, Paul NE, et al. (2016). Low-dose IL-2 selectively activates subsets of CD4(+) Tregs and NK cells. JCI Insight, 1(18), e89278. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.89278

[88] McQuaid SL, Loughran ST, Power PA, Maguire P, Szczygiel A, & Johnson PA. (2020). Low-dose IL-2 induces CD56(bright) NK regulation of T cells via NKp44 and NKp46. Clin Exp Immunol, 200(3), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13422

[89] Li Z, Lim WK, Mahesh SP, Liu B, & Nussenblatt RB. (2005). Cutting edge: in vivo blockade of human IL-2 receptor induces expansion of CD56(bright) regulatory NK cells in patients with active uveitis. J Immunol, 174(9), 5187-5191. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5187

[90] Lee M, Bell CJM, Rubio Garcia A, Godfrey L, Pekalski M, Wicker LS, et al. (2023). CD56(bright) natural killer cells preferentially kill proliferating CD4(+) T cells. Discov Immunol, 2(1), kyad012. https://doi.org/10.1093/discim/kyad012

[91] Gumá M, Angulo A, Vilches C, Gómez-Lozano N, Malats N, & López-Botet M. (2004). Imprint of human cytomegalovirus infection on the NK cell receptor repertoire. Blood, 104(12), 3664-3671. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-05-2058

[92] Chen J, Ren E, Tao Z, Lu H, Huang Y, Li J, et al. (2025). Orchestrating T and NK cells for tumor immunotherapy via NKG2A-targeted delivery of a de novo designed IL-2Rβγ agonist. Drug Deliv, 32(1), 2482195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2025.2482195

[93] Unger ML, Hokland M, Basse PH, Nannmark U, & Johansson BR. (1997). High dose IL-2-activated murine natural killer (A-NK) cells accumulate glycogen and granules, lose cytotoxicity, and alter target cell interaction in vitro. Scand J Immunol, 45(6), 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3083.1997.d01-437.x

[94] Tiemessen MM, Jagger AL, Evans HG, van Herwijnen MJ, John S, & Taams LS. (2007). CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induce alternative activation of human monocytes/macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104(49), 19446-19451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706832104

[95] Moore KW, de Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL, & O'Garra A. (2001). Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol, 19, 683-765. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683

[96] Zhang X, Miao M, Zhang R, Liu X, Zhao X, Shao M, et al. (2022). Efficacy and safety of low-dose interleukin-2 in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 7(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00887-2

[97] Xue R, Li G, Zhou Y, Wang B, Xu Y, Zhao P, et al. (2024). Efficacy and safety of low-dose interleukin 2 in the treatment of moderate-to-severe bullous pemphigoid: A single center perspective-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol, 91(6), 1113-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.08.033

[98] Li ZG, He J, & Miao M. (2023). Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: facts and hopes. Sci. Bull., 68(1), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.12.024

[99] Malek TR. (2008). The biology of interleukin-2. Annu Rev Immunol, 26, 453-479. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090357

[100] Lykhopiy V, Malviya V, Humblet-Baron S, & Schlenner SM. (2023). "IL-2 immunotherapy for targeting regulatory T cells in autoimmunity". Genes Immun, 24(5), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-023-00221-y

[101] Shevach EM. (2009). Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity, 30(5), 636-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.010

[102] Panduro M, Benoist C, & Mathis D. (2016). Tissue Tregs. Annu Rev Immunol, 34, 609-633. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095948

[103] Klatzmann D, & Abbas AK. (2015). The promise of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol, 15(5), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3823

[104] Castela E, Le Duff F, Butori C, Ticchioni M, Hofman P, Bahadoran P, et al. (2014). Effects of low-dose recombinant interleukin 2 to promote T-regulatory cells in alopecia areata. JAMA Dermatol, 150(7), 748-751. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.504

[105] Dong S, Hiam-Galvez KJ, Mowery CT, Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Esensten JH, et al. (2021). The effect of low-dose IL-2 and Treg adoptive cell therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. JCI Insight, 6(18). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.147474

[106] Lim TY, Perpinan E, Londono MC, Miquel R, Ruiz P, Kurt AS, et al. (2023). Low dose interleukin-2 selectively expands circulating regulatory T cells but fails to promote liver allograft tolerance in humans. J Hepatol, 78(1), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.035

[107] Le Duff F, Bouaziz JD, Fontas E, Ticchioni M, Viguier M, Dereure O, et al. (2021). Low-Dose IL-2 for Treating Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata: A 52-Week Multicenter Prospective Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing its Impact on T Regulatory Cell and NK Cell Populations. J Invest Dermatol, 141(4), 933-936.e936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.08.015

[108] Humrich JY, Cacoub P, Rosenzwajg M, Pitoiset F, Pham HP, Guidoux J, et al. (2022). Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in active systemic lupus erythematosus (LUPIL-2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised and placebo-controlled phase II trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 81(12), 1685-1694. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-222501

[109] Koreth J, Kim HT, Jones KT, Lange PB, Reynolds CG, Chammas MJ, et al. (2016). Efficacy, durability, and response predictors of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood, 128(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-02-702852

[110] Farooq A, Trehan S, Singh G, Arora N, Mehta T, Jain P, et al. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Low-Dose Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Clinical Applications. Cureus, 16(9), e68748. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68748

[111] Malek TR, & Bayer AL. (2004). Tolerance, not immunity, crucially depends on IL-2. Nat Rev Immunol, 4(9), 665-674. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1435

[112] Todd JA, Evangelou M, Cutler AJ, Pekalski ML, Walker NM, Stevens HE, et al. (2016). Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial. PLoS Med, 13(10), e1002139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002139

[113] Miao M, Xiao X, Tian J, Zhufeng Y, Feng R, Zhang R, et al. (2021). Therapeutic potential of targeting Tfr/Tfh cell balance by low-dose-IL-2 in active SLE: a post hoc analysis from a double-blind RCT study. Arthritis Res. Ther., 23(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02535-6

[114] He J, Zhang X, Wei Y, Sun X, Chen Y, Deng J, et al. (2016). Low-dose interleukin-2 treatment selectively modulates CD4(+) T cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Med., 22(9), 991-993. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4148

[115] Humrich JY, & Riemekasten G. (2019). Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 31(2), 208-212. https://doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000575

[116] von Spee-Mayer C, Siegert E, Abdirama D, Rose A, Klaus A, Alexander T, et al. (2016). Low-dose interleukin-2 selectively corrects regulatory T cell defects in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 75(7), 1407-1415. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207776

[117] Hu FY, Wang J, Zhang SX, Su R, Yan N, Gao C, et al. (2021). Absolute reduction of peripheral regulatory T cell in patients with relapsing polychondritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 39(3), 487-493. https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qndtvt

[118] Rosenzwajg M, Salet R, Lorenzon R, Tchitchek N, Roux A, Bernard C, et al. (2020). Low-dose IL-2 in children with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a Phase I/II randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study. Diabetologia, 63(9), 1808-1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05200-w

[119] Saadoun D, Rosenzwajg M, Joly F, Six A, Carrat F, Thibault V, et al. (2011). Regulatory T-cell responses to low-dose interleukin-2 in HCV-induced vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med., 365(22), 2067-2077. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1105143

[120] Wang D, Fu B, Shen X, Guo C, Liu Y, Zhang J, et al. (2021). Restoration of HBV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses by sequential low-dose IL-2 treatment in non-responder patients after IFN-alpha therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 6(1), 376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00776-0

[121] Zhou X, Wang Y, Huang B, Feng R, Zhou X, Li C, et al. (2023). Dynamics of T follicular helper cells in patients with rheumatic diseases and subsequent antibody responses in a three-dose immunization regimen of CoronaVac. Immunology, 168(1), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13572

[122] Zhang B, Sun J, Wang Y, Ji D, Yuan Y, Li S, et al. (2021). Site-specific PEGylation of interleukin-2 enhances immunosuppression via the sustained activation of regulatory T cells. Nat. Biomed. Eng., 5(11), 1288-1305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00797-8

[123] Levin AM, Bates DL, Ring AM, Krieg C, Lin JT, Su L, et al. (2012). Exploiting a natural conformational switch to engineer an interleukin-2 'superkine'. Nature, 484(7395), 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10975

[124] Sockolosky JT, Trotta E, Parisi G, Picton L, Su LL, Le AC, et al. (2018). Selective targeting of engineered T cells using orthogonal IL-2 cytokine-receptor complexes. Science, 359(6379), 1037-1042. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3246

[125] Horwitz DA, Kim D, Kang C, Brion K, Bickerton S, & La Cava A. (2025). CD2-targeted nanoparticles encapsulating IL-2 induce tolerogenic Tregs and TGF-β-producing NK cells that stabilize Tregs for long-term therapeutic efficacy in immune-mediated disorders. Front Immunol, 16, 1587237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1587237

[126] Koh B, Oz STG, Sato R, Nguyen HN, Dunlap G, Mahony C, et al. (2025). Functional and dysfunctional T regulatory cell states in human tissues in RA and other autoimmune arthritic diseases. bioRxiv, 10.1101/2025.09.23.677874. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.677874

[127] Raposo A, Paço S, Ângelo-Dias M, Rosmaninho P, Almeida ARM, & Sousa AE. (2025). The distinctive signature of regulatory CD4 T cells committed in the human thymus. Front Immunol, 16, 1553554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1553554

[128] Cheng Z, Wang LJ, Honaker Y, Cincotta SA, Page CE, Vollhardt S, et al. (2025). Transcriptional fingerprinting of regulatory T cells: ensuring quality in cell therapy applications. Front Immunol, 16, 1602172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1602172

[129] Arroyo-Olarte RD, Flores-Castelán JC, Armas-López L, Escobedo G, Terrazas LI, Ávila-Moreno F, et al. (2024). Targeted Demethylation of FOXP3-TSDR Enhances the Suppressive Capacity of STAT6-deficient Inducible T Regulatory Cells. Inflammation, 47(6), 2159-2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-024-02031-4

[130] Kressler C, Gasparoni G, Nordström K, Hamo D, Salhab A, Dimitropoulos C, et al. (2020). Targeted De-Methylation of the FOXP3-TSDR Is Sufficient to Induce Physiological FOXP3 Expression but Not a Functional Treg Phenotype. Front Immunol, 11, 609891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.609891

[131] Xu K, Liu Q, Wu K, Liu L, Zhao M, Yang H, et al. (2020). Extracellular vesicles as potential biomarkers and therapeutic approaches in autoimmune diseases. J Transl Med, 18(1), 432. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02609-0

[132] Feng R, Xiao X, Huang B, Zhang K, Zhang X, Li Z, et al. (2024). Predictive biomarkers for low-dose IL-2 therapy efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinical analysis. Arthritis Res Ther, 26(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03388-5

[133] Friedberg JW, Neuberg D, Gribben JG, Fisher DC, Canning C, Koval M, et al. (2002). Combination immunotherapy with rituximab and interleukin 2 in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J Haematol, 117(4), 828-834. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03535.x

[134] Zhou H, Zhao X, Zhang R, Miao M, Pei W, Li Z, et al. (2023). Low-dose IL-2 mitigates glucocorticoid-induced Treg impairment and promotes improvement of SLE. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01350-6

[135] Cases M, Ritter N, Rincon-Arevalo H, Kroh S, Adam A, Kirchner M, et al. (2025). Novel non-coding FOXP3 transcript isoform associated to potential transcriptional interference in human regulatory T cells. RNA Biol, 22(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2025.2502719

[136] Ramón-Vázquez A, Flood P, Cashman TL, Patil P, & Ghosh S. (2025). T lymphocyte plasticity in chronic inflammatory diseases: The emerging role of the Ikaros family as a key Th17-Treg switch. Autoimmun Rev, 24(3), 103735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103735

[137] Lu Y, & Man XY. (2025). Diversity and function of regulatory T cells in health and autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun, 151, 103357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103357

[138] Bothur E, Raifer H, Haftmann C, Stittrich AB, Brüstle A, Brenner D, et al. (2015). Antigen receptor-mediated depletion of FOXP3 in induced regulatory T-lymphocytes via PTPN2 and FOXO1. Nat Commun, 6, 8576. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9576

[139] Long SA, Cerosaletti K, Wan JY, Ho JC, Tatum M, Wei S, et al. (2011). An autoimmune-associated variant in PTPN2 reveals an impairment of IL-2R signaling in CD4(+) T cells. Genes Immun, 12(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1038/gene.2010.54

[140] Lin JX, Ge M, Liu CY, Holewinski R, Andresson T, Yu ZX, et al. (2024). Tyrosine phosphorylation of both STAT5A and STAT5B is necessary for maximal IL-2 signaling and T cell proliferation. Nat Commun, 15(1), 7372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50925-6

[141] Santarlasci V, Mazzoni A, Capone M, Rossi MC, Maggi L, Montaini G, et al. (2017). Musculin inhibits human T-helper 17 cell response to interleukin 2 by controlling STAT5B activity. Eur J Immunol, 47(9), 1427-1442. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201746996

[142] Li Y, Lin D, Chen J, Zhang W, Jin H, Feng S, et al. (2025). Alkaline phosphatase-responsive hydrogel for efficient management of autoimmune intraocular inflammation. J Control Release, 387, 114229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114229

[143] Wahbi M, Wen Y, Kontopoulou M, & De France KJ. (2025). Modification of cellulose nanocrystals with epoxidized canola oil for enhancing interfacial compatibility with poly(lactic acid). Carbohydr Polym, 370, 124471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.124471

[144] Shin H, Kang S, Won C, & Min DH. (2023). Enhanced Local Delivery of Engineered IL-2 mRNA by Porous Silica Nanoparticles to Promote Effective Antitumor Immunity. ACS Nano, 17(17), 17554-17567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c06733

[145] Jeon EY, Choi DS, Choi S, Won JY, Jo Y, Kim HB, et al. (2023). Enhancing adoptive T-cell therapy with fucoidan-based IL-2 delivery microcapsules. Bioeng Transl Med, 8(1), e10362. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10362

[146] Wang J, Zhou L, & Liu B. (2020). Update on disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of primary Sjögren's syndrome. Int J Rheum Dis, 23(6), 723-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.13839

[147] Streckfus C, Bigler L, Navazesh M, & Al-Hashimi I. (2001). Cytokine concentrations in stimulated whole saliva among patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome, secondary Sjögren's syndrome, and patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome receiving varying doses of interferon for symptomatic treatment of the condition: a preliminary study. Clin Oral Investig, 5(2), 133-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840100104

[148] Zhao Z, Zhang X, Su L, Xu L, Zheng Y, & Sun J. (2018). Fine tuning subsets of CD4(+) T cells by low-dosage of IL-2 and a new therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases. Int Immunopharmacol, 56, 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2018.01.042

[149] Villani AC, Sarkizova S, & Hacohen N. (2018). Systems Immunology: Learning the Rules of the Immune System. Annu Rev Immunol, 36, 813-842. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053035

[150] Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly YM, et al. (2013). The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science, 341(6145), 569-573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241165

[151] Verra N, Jansen R, Groenewegen G, Mallo H, Kersten MJ, Bex A, et al. (2003). Immunotherapy with concurrent subcutaneous GM-CSF, low-dose IL-2 and IFN-alpha in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer, 88(9), 1346-1351. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600915

[152] Zhao XY, Zhao XS, Wang YT, Chen YH, Xu LP, Zhang XH, et al. (2016). Prophylactic use of low-dose interleukin-2 and the clinical outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A randomized study. Oncoimmunology, 5(12), e1250992. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2016.1250992

[153] Faridar A, Gamez N, Li D, Wang Y, Boradia R, Thome AD, et al. (2025). Low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized clinical trial. Alzheimers Res Ther, 17(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01791-x

[154] Bensimon G, Leigh PN, Tree T, Malaspina A, Payan CA, Pham HP, et al. (2025). Efficacy and safety of low-dose IL-2 as an add-on therapy to riluzole (MIROCALS): a phase 2b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 405(10492), 1837-1850. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00262-4

[155] Tong B, Leong SG, Jian T, Niu G, Gai Y, Meng X, et al. (2024). Site-specific pegylated IL2 mutein with biased IL2 receptor binding for cancer immunotherapy. Int Immunopharmacol, 136, 112359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112359

[156] Karakus U, Sahin D, Mittl PRE, Mooij P, Koopman G, & Boyman O. (2020). Receptor-gated IL-2 delivery by an anti-human IL-2 antibody activates regulatory T cells in three different species. Sci. Transl. Med., 12(574). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abb9283

[157] Chen X, Wang L, Liu Q, Jia J, Liu Y, Zhang W, et al. (2014). Polycation-decorated PLA microspheres induce robust immune responses via commonly used parenteral administration routes. Int Immunopharmacol, 23(2), 592-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2014.10.010

[158] Khoryati L, Pham MN, Sherve M, Kumari S, Cook K, Pearson J, et al. (2020). An IL-2 mutein engineered to promote expansion of regulatory T cells arrests ongoing autoimmunity in mice. Sci Immunol, 5(50). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aba5264

Figures
References
Peer
Information

Figure 1. Mechanistic network of low-dose IL-2 in immune regulation. Low-dose IL-2 preferentially signals through the high-affinity IL-2 receptor (IL-2Rαβγ) on regulatory T cells, engaging JAK–STAT and mTOR–AMPK signaling. These pathways sustain Foxp3 transcription and reprogram cellular metabolism, thereby stabilizing Treg identity and function. The resulting network suppresses Th17 and Tfh responses while maintaining CD8+ T and NK cell homeostasis, collectively restoring immune balance.

Figure 2. Dose-dependent biphasic effects of IL-2 on Treg cells. Low-dose IL-2 induces a selective, dose-dependent expansion of CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ Tregs through engagement of the high-affinity IL-2Rαβγ complex, with maximal response at approximately 1×10⁶ IU. Higher doses may activate conventional T (Tconv) and NK cells, thereby diminishing Treg selectivity and shifting the immune balance toward activation.

Figure 3. Engineered IL-2 variants and targeted delivery strategies. (A) Topological Engineered IL2 Variants. Rational IL2 mutation to reduce IL-2Rβ affinity while preserving IL-2Rα binding, achieving CD25-biased agonists with enhanced Treg selectivity, prolonged half-life, and higher stability. (B) Targeted Delivery for Sustained Release. A hybrid nanoparticle platform combining PLA microspheres and exosomes enables designed for controlled IL-2 release, maintaining therapeutic concentrations within the selective window. (C) Tissue-Selective Immunomodulation. Local injection including salivary, gland and joint concentrates IL-2 at sites of inflammation, maximizing Treg enrichment and resulting in reduced inflammation with limited systemic toxicity.

[1] Morgan DA, Ruscetti FW, & Gallo R. (1976). Selective in vitro growth of T lymphocytes from normal human bone marrows. Science, 193(4257), 1007-1008. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181845

[2] Rosenberg SA. (2014). IL-2: the first effective immunotherapy for human cancer. J Immunol, 192(12), 5451-5458. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1490019

[3] Hu W, Dolsten GA, Wang EY, Beroshvili G, Wang ZM, Ghelani AP, et al. (2025). Temporal and context-dependent requirements for the transcription factor Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol, 10.1038/s41590-025-02295-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-025-02295-4

[4] Boyman O, & Sprent J. (2012). The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol, 12(3), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3156

[5] Wang X, Rickert M, & Garcia KC. (2005). Structure of the quaternary complex of interleukin-2 with its alpha, beta, and gammac receptors. Science, 310(5751), 1159-1163. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1117893

[6] Overwijk WW, Tagliaferri MA, & Zalevsky J. (2021). Engineering IL-2 to Give New Life to T Cell Immunotherapy. Annu Rev Med, 72, 281-311. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-073118-011031

[7] Koreth J, Matsuoka K, Kim HT, McDonough SM, Bindra B, Alyea EP, 3rd, et al. (2011). Interleukin-2 and regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 365(22), 2055-2066. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1108188

[8] He J, Zhang R, Shao M, Zhao X, Miao M, Chen J, et al. (2020). Efficacy and safety of low-dose IL-2 in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 79(1), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215396

[9] He J, Chen J, Miao M, Zhang R, Cheng G, Wang Y, et al. (2022). Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Interleukin 2 for Primary Sjögren Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open, 5(11), e2241451. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41451

[10] Hartemann A, Bensimon G, Payan CA, Jacqueminet S, Bourron O, Nicolas N, et al. (2013). Low-dose interleukin 2 in patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase 1/2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 1(4), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70113-X

[11] Mitra S, & Leonard WJ. (2018). Biology of IL-2 and its therapeutic modulation: Mechanisms and strategies. J Leukoc Biol, 103(4), 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.2ri0717-278r

[12] Abbas AK, Trotta E, D RS, Marson A, & Bluestone JA. (2018). Revisiting IL-2: Biology and therapeutic prospects. Sci Immunol, 3(25). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aat1482

[13] Johnston JA, Kawamura M, Kirken RA, Chen YQ, Blake TB, Shibuya K, et al. (1994). Phosphorylation and activation of the Jak-3 Janus kinase in response to interleukin-2. Nature, 370(6485), 151-153. https://doi.org/10.1038/370151a0

[14] Ghoreschi K, Laurence A, & O'Shea JJ. (2009). Janus kinases in immune cell signaling. Immunol Rev, 228(1), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00754.x

[15] Lin JX, Li P, Liu D, Jin HT, He J, Ata Ur Rasheed M, et al. (2012). Critical Role of STAT5 transcription factor tetramerization for cytokine responses and normal immune function. Immunity, 36(4), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.02.017

[16] Chinen T, Kannan AK, Levine AG, Fan X, Klein U, Zheng Y, et al. (2016). An essential role for the IL-2 receptor in T(reg) cell function. Nat Immunol, 17(11), 1322-1333. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3540

[17] Feng Y, van der Veeken J, Shugay M, Putintseva EV, Osmanbeyoglu HU, Dikiy S, et al. (2015). A mechanism for expansion of regulatory T-cell repertoire and its role in self-tolerance. Nature, 528(7580), 132-136. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16141

[18] Ise W, Kohyama M, Nutsch KM, Lee HM, Suri A, Unanue ER, et al. (2010). CTLA-4 suppresses the pathogenicity of self antigen-specific T cells by cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic mechanisms. Nat Immunol, 11(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1835

[19] Zheng Y, Josefowicz SZ, Kas A, Chu TT, Gavin MA, & Rudensky AY. (2007). Genome-wide analysis of Foxp3 target genes in developing and mature regulatory T cells. Nature, 445(7130), 936-940. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05563

[20] Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T, Miyara M, Fehervari Z, et al. (2008). CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function. Science, 322(5899), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160062

[21] Yao Z, Kanno Y, Kerenyi M, Stephens G, Durant L, Watford WT, et al. (2007). Nonredundant roles for Stat5a/b in directly regulating Foxp3. Blood, 109(10), 4368-4375. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-11-055756

[22] Feng Y, Arvey A, Chinen T, van der Veeken J, Gasteiger G, & Rudensky AY. (2014). Control of the inheritance of regulatory T cell identity by a cis element in the Foxp3 locus. Cell, 158(4), 749-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.031

[23] Shevyrev D, & Tereshchenko V. (2019). Treg Heterogeneity, Function, and Homeostasis. Front Immunol, 10, 3100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03100

[24] Wang X, Szymczak-Workman AL, Gravano DM, Workman CJ, Green DR, & Vignali DA. (2012). Preferential control of induced regulatory T cell homeostasis via a Bim/Bcl-2 axis. Cell Death Dis, 3(2), e270. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2012.9

[25] Barahona de Brito C, & Patra AK. (2022). NFAT Factors Are Dispensable for the Development but Are Critical for the Maintenance of Foxp3(+) Regulatory T Cells. Cells, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091397

[26] Wieczorek G, Asemissen A, Model F, Turbachova I, Floess S, Liebenberg V, et al. (2009). Quantitative DNA methylation analysis of FOXP3 as a new method for counting regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and solid tissue. Cancer Res, 69(2), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-08-2361

[27] Chen Q, Kim YC, Laurence A, Punkosdy GA, & Shevach EM. (2011). IL-2 controls the stability of Foxp3 expression in TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ T cells in vivo. J Immunol, 186(11), 6329-6337. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1100061

[28] Bending D, Pesenacker AM, Ursu S, Wu Q, Lom H, Thirugnanabalan B, et al. (2014). Hypomethylation at the regulatory T cell-specific demethylated region in CD25hi T cells is decoupled from FOXP3 expression at the inflamed site in childhood arthritis. J Immunol, 193(6), 2699-2708. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1400599

[29] Huss DJ, Mehta DS, Sharma A, You X, Riester KA, Sheridan JP, et al. (2015). In vivo maintenance of human regulatory T cells during CD25 blockade. J Immunol, 194(1), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1402140

[30] Toker A, Engelbert D, Garg G, Polansky JK, Floess S, Miyao T, et al. (2013). Active demethylation of the Foxp3 locus leads to the generation of stable regulatory T cells within the thymus. J Immunol, 190(7), 3180-3188. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1203473

[31] Correa LO, Jordan MS, & Carty SA. (2020). DNA Methylation in T-Cell Development and Differentiation. Crit Rev Immunol, 40(2), 135-156. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2020033728

[32] Chen C, Wang Z, Ding Y, Wang L, Wang S, Wang H, et al. (2022). DNA Methylation: From Cancer Biology to Clinical Perspectives. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed), 27(12), 326. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2712326

[33] Guo C, Liu Q, Zong D, Zhang W, Zuo Z, Yu Q, et al. (2022). Single-cell transcriptome profiling and chromatin accessibility reveal an exhausted regulatory CD4+ T cell subset in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Rep, 41(6), 111606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111606

[34] Bonazzi S, d'Hennezel E, Beckwith REJ, Xu L, Fazal A, Magracheva A, et al. (2023). Discovery and characterization of a selective IKZF2 glue degrader for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Chem Biol, 30(3), 235-247.e212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.02.005

[35] Xin Y, Yang M, Zhao Z, He Z, Mei Y, Xiong F, et al. (2025). AIM2 deficiency in CD4(+) T cells promotes psoriasis-like inflammation by regulating Th17-Treg axis via AIM2-IKZF2 pathway. J Autoimmun, 150, 103351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2024.103351

[36] McDonald-Hyman C, Aguilar EG, Compeer EB, Zaiken MC, Rhee SY, Mohamed FA, et al. (2025). Acetyl-CoA carboxylase-1 inhibition increases regulatory T-Cell metabolism and graft-vs-host disease treatment efficacy via mitochondrial fusion. J Clin Invest, 10.1172/jci182480. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci182480

[37] Han J, Zhou Z, Wang H, Chen Y, Li W, Dai M, et al. (2025). Dysfunctional glycolysis-UCP2-fatty acid oxidation promotes CTLA4(int)FOXP3(int) regulatory T-cell production in rheumatoid arthritis. Mol Med, 31(1), 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-025-01372-6

[38] Feng R, Xiao X, Wang Y, Huang B, Chen J, Cheng G, et al. (2024). Metabolic impact of low dose IL-2 therapy for primary Sjögren's Syndrome in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol, 43(12), 3789-3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07165-2

[39] Duan W, Ding Y, Yu X, Ma D, Yang B, Li Y, et al. (2019). Metformin mitigates autoimmune insulitis by inhibiting Th1 and Th17 responses while promoting Treg production. Am J Transl Res, 11(4), 2393-2402.

[40] Pokhrel RH, Kang B, Timilshina M, & Chang JH. (2022). AMPK Amplifies IL2-STAT5 Signaling to Maintain Stability of Regulatory T Cells in Aged Mice. Int J Mol Sci, 23(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012384

[41] De La Rosa J, Geller AM, LeGros HL, Jr., & Kotb M. (1992). Induction of interleukin 2 production but not methionine adenosyltransferase activity or S-adenosylmethionine turnover in Jurkat T-cells. Cancer Res, 52(12), 3361-3366.

[42] Sahin E, & Sahin M. (2019). Epigenetical Targeting of the FOXP3 Gene by S-Adenosylmethionine Diminishes the Suppressive Capacity of Regulatory T Cells Ex Vivo and Alters the Expression Profiles. J Immunother, 42(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/cji.0000000000000247

[43] Field CS, Baixauli F, Kyle RL, Puleston DJ, Cameron AM, Sanin DE, et al. (2020). Mitochondrial Integrity Regulated by Lipid Metabolism Is a Cell-Intrinsic Checkpoint for Treg Suppressive Function. Cell Metab, 31(2), 422-437.e425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.11.021

[44] Zhang X, Wang G, Bi Y, Jiang Z, & Wang X. (2022). Inhibition of glutaminolysis ameliorates lupus by regulating T and B cell subsets and downregulating the mTOR/P70S6K/4EBP1 and NLRP3/caspase-1/IL-1β pathways in MRL/lpr mice. Int Immunopharmacol, 112, 109133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109133

[45] Deaglio S, Dwyer KM, Gao W, Friedman D, Usheva A, Erat A, et al. (2007). Adenosine generation catalyzed by CD39 and CD73 expressed on regulatory T cells mediates immune suppression. J Exp Med, 204(6), 1257-1265. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20062512

[46] Arpaia N, Green JA, Moltedo B, Arvey A, Hemmers S, Yuan S, et al. (2015). A Distinct Function of Regulatory T Cells in Tissue Protection. Cell, 162(5), 1078-1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.021

[47] Zhang P, Wang J, Miao J, & Zhu P. (2025). The dual role of tissue regulatory T cells in tissue repair: return to homeostasis or fibrosis. Front Immunol, 16, 1560578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1560578

[48] Hilaire M, Mimoun A, Cagnet L, Villette R, Roubanis A, Sentenac H, et al. (2025). Neonatal regulatory T cells persist into adulthood across multiple tissues with high enrichment in the skin. Sci Adv, 11(40), eadx8037. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx8037

[49] Fallegger A, Priola M, Artola-Borán M, Núñez NG, Wild S, Gurtner A, et al. (2022). TGF-β production by eosinophils drives the expansion of peripherally induced neuropilin(-) RORγt(+) regulatory T-cells during bacterial and allergen challenge. Mucosal Immunol, 15(3), 504-514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41385-022-00484-0

[50] Zhou X, Tang J, Cao H, Fan H, & Li B. (2015). Tissue resident regulatory T cells: novel therapeutic targets for human disease. Cell Mol Immunol, 12(5), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2015.23

[51] Wang Y, Feng R, Cheng G, Huang B, Tian J, Gan Y, et al. (2022). Low Dose Interleukin-2 Ameliorates Sjögren's Syndrome in a Murine Model. Front Med (Lausanne), 9, 887354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.887354

[52] Xie F, Zhou X, Fang M, Li H, Su P, Tu Y, et al. (2019). Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer Immune Microenvironment and Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6(24), 1901779. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201901779

[53] Xia Y, Jiang H, Wang C, Liu Z, Gao H, Yu JF, et al. (2025). Treg cell-derived exosomal miR-21 promotes osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells. BMC Oral Health, 25(1), 1465. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06770-0

[54] Okoye IS, Coomes SM, Pelly VS, Czieso S, Papayannopoulos V, Tolmachova T, et al. (2014). MicroRNA-containing T-regulatory-cell-derived exosomes suppress pathogenic T helper 1 cells. Immunity, 41(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.019

[55] Rahmani M, Mohammadnia-Afrouzi M, Nouri HR, Fattahi S, Akhavan-Niaki H, & Mostafazadeh A. (2018). Human PBMCs fight or flight response to starvation stress: Increased T-reg, FOXP3, and TGF-β1 with decreased miR-21 and Constant miR-181c levels. Biomed Pharmacother, 108, 1404-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.163

[56] Gertel S, Polachek A, Elkayam O, & Furer V. (2022). Lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) regulatory T cells: An evolving biomarker for treatment response in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev, 21(6), 103085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103085

[57] Ravichandran R, Itabashi Y, Fleming T, Bansal S, Bowen S, Poulson C, et al. (2022). Low-dose IL-2 prevents murine chronic cardiac allograft rejection: Role for IL-2-induced T regulatory cells and exosomes with PD-L1 and CD73. Am J Transplant, 22(9), 2180-2194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.17101

[58] Churlaud G, Jimenez V, Ruberte J, Amadoudji Zin M, Fourcade G, Gottrand G, et al. (2014). Sustained stimulation and expansion of Tregs by IL2 control autoimmunity without impairing immune responses to infection, vaccination and cancer. Clin Immunol, 151(2), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2014.02.003

[59] Feng M, Guo H, Zhang C, Wang Y, Liang Z, Zhao X, et al. (2019). Absolute reduction of regulatory T cells and regulatory effect of short-term and low-dose IL-2 in polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Int Immunopharmacol, 77, 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105912

[60] Rosenzwajg M, Lorenzon R, Cacoub P, Pham HP, Pitoiset F, El Soufi K, et al. (2019). Immunological and clinical effects of low-dose interleukin-2 across 11 autoimmune diseases in a single, open clinical trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 78(2), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214229

[61] Fusi I, Serger C, Herzig P, Germann M, Sandholzer MT, Oelgarth N, et al. (2025). PD-1-targeted cis-delivery of an IL-2 variant induces a multifaceted antitumoral T cell response in human lung cancer. Sci Transl Med, 17(816), eadr3718. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.adr3718

[62] Kehry MR, Yamashita LC, & Hodgkin PD. (1990). B-cell proliferation and differentiation mediated by Th-cell membranes and lymphokines. Res Immunol, 141(4-5), 421-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-2494(90)90033-u

[63] Cen Z, Li Y, Wei B, Wu W, Huang Y, & Lu J. (2021). The Role of B Cells in Regulation of Th Cell Differentiation in Coxsackievirus B3-Induced Acute Myocarditis. Inflammation, 44(5), 1949-1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-021-01472-5

[64] Park E, & Ciofani M. (2025). Th17 cell pathogenicity in autoimmune disease. Exp Mol Med, 57(9), 1913-1927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01535-9

[65] Cheng H, Nan F, Ji N, Ma X, Zhang J, Liang H, et al. (2025). Regulatory T cell therapy promotes TGF-β and IL-6-dependent pro-inflammatory Th17 cell generation by reducing IL-2. Nat Commun, 16(1), 7644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62628-7

[66] Dold L, Kalthoff S, Frank L, Zhou T, Esser P, Lutz P, et al. (2024). STAT activation in regulatory CD4(+) T cells of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Immun Inflamm Dis, 12(4), e1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.1248

[67] Kim S, Boehme L, Nel L, Casian A, Sangle S, Nova-Lamperti E, et al. (2022). Defective STAT5 Activation and Aberrant Expression of BCL6 in Naive CD4 T Cells Enhances Follicular Th Cell-like Differentiation in Patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. J Immunol, 208(4), 807-818. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2001331

[68] Ballesteros-Tato A, León B, Graf BA, Moquin A, Adams PS, Lund FE, et al. (2012). Interleukin-2 inhibits germinal center formation by limiting T follicular helper cell differentiation. Immunity, 36(5), 847-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.02.012

[69] Chaudhry A, Rudra D, Treuting P, Samstein RM, Liang Y, Kas A, et al. (2009). CD4+ regulatory T cells control TH17 responses in a Stat3-dependent manner. Science, 326(5955), 986-991. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172702

[70] Rosenzwajg M, Lorenzon R, Cacoub P, Pham HP, Pitoiset F, El Soufi K, et al. (2019). Immunological and clinical effects of low-dose interleukin-2 across 11 autoimmune diseases in a single, open clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis, 78(2), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214229

[71] Miao M, Li Y, Xu D, Zhang R, He J, Sun X, et al. (2022). Therapeutic responses and predictors of low-dose interleukin-2 in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 40(5), 867-871. https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/1o6pn1

[72] Rose A, von Spee-Mayer C, Kloke L, Wu K, Kühl A, Enghard P, et al. (2019). IL-2 Therapy Diminishes Renal Inflammation and the Activity of Kidney-Infiltrating CD4+ T Cells in Murine Lupus Nephritis. Cells, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8101234

[73] Zhou P, Chen J, He J, Zheng T, Yunis J, Makota V, et al. (2021). Low-dose IL-2 therapy invigorates CD8+ T cells for viral control in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS Pathog, 17(10), e1009858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009858

[74] Kim N, Jeon YW, Nam YS, Lim JY, Im KI, Lee ES, et al. (2016). Therapeutic potential of low-dose IL-2 in a chronic GVHD patient by in vivo expansion of regulatory T cells. Cytokine, 78, 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2015.11.020

[75] Wang F, Wang S, He B, Liu H, Wang X, Li C, et al. (2021). Immunotherapeutic strategy based on anti-OX40L and low dose of IL-2 to prolong graft survival in sensitized mice by inducing the generation of CD4(+) and CD8(+) Tregs. Int Immunopharmacol, 97, 107663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107663

[76] Onyshchenko K, Luo R, Guffart E, Gaedicke S, Grosu AL, Firat E, et al. (2023). Expansion of circulating stem-like CD8(+) T cells by adding CD122-directed IL-2 complexes to radiation and anti-PD1 therapies in mice. Nat Commun, 14(1), 2087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37825-x

[77] Kalia V, Sarkar S, Subramaniam S, Haining WN, Smith KA, & Ahmed R. (2010). Prolonged interleukin-2Ralpha expression on virus-specific CD8+ T cells favors terminal-effector differentiation in vivo. Immunity, 32(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.11.010

[78] Shameli A, Yamanouchi J, Tsai S, Yang Y, Clemente-Casares X, Moore A, et al. (2013). IL-2 promotes the function of memory-like autoregulatory CD8+ T cells but suppresses their development via FoxP3+ Treg cells. Eur J Immunol, 43(2), 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201242845

[79] Li S, Xie Q, Zeng Y, Zou C, Liu X, Wu S, et al. (2014). A naturally occurring CD8(+)CD122(+) T-cell subset as a memory-like Treg family. Cell Mol Immunol, 11(4), 326-331. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2014.25

[80] Horwitz DA, Zheng SG, & Gray JD. (2003). The role of the combination of IL-2 and TGF-beta or IL-10 in the generation and function of CD4+ CD25+ and CD8+ regulatory T cell subsets. J Leukoc Biol, 74(4), 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0503228

[81] Minai Y, Hisatsune T, Nishijima K, Enomoto A, & Kaminogawa S. (1994). Activation via TCR or IL-2 receptor of a CD8+ suppressor T cell clone: effect on IL-10 production and on proliferation of the suppressor T cell. Cytotechnology, 14(2), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00758172

[82] Elrefaei M, Ventura FL, Baker CA, Clark R, Bangsberg DR, & Cao H. (2007). HIV-specific IL-10-positive CD8+ T cells suppress cytolysis and IL-2 production by CD8+ T cells. J Immunol, 178(5), 3265-3271. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.3265

[83] Grange M, Giordano M, Mas A, Roncagalli R, Firaguay G, Nunes JA, et al. (2015). Control of CD8 T cell proliferation and terminal differentiation by active STAT5 and CDKN2A/CDKN2B. Immunology, 145(4), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12471

[84] Qin Y, Qian Y, Zhang J, & Liu S. (2025). CD1d-Restricted NKT Cells Promote Central Memory CD8(+) T Cell Formation via an IL-15-pSTAT5-Eomes Axis in a Pathogen-Exposed Environment. Int J Mol Sci, 26(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157272

[85] Caligiuri MA. (2008). Human natural killer cells. Blood, 112(3), 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-09-077438

[86] Harris KE, Lorentsen KJ, Malik-Chaudhry HK, Loughlin K, Basappa HM, Hartstein S, et al. (2021). A bispecific antibody agonist of the IL-2 heterodimeric receptor preferentially promotes in vivo expansion of CD8 and NK cells. Sci Rep, 11(1), 10592. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90096-8

[87] Hirakawa M, Matos TR, Liu H, Koreth J, Kim HT, Paul NE, et al. (2016). Low-dose IL-2 selectively activates subsets of CD4(+) Tregs and NK cells. JCI Insight, 1(18), e89278. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.89278

[88] McQuaid SL, Loughran ST, Power PA, Maguire P, Szczygiel A, & Johnson PA. (2020). Low-dose IL-2 induces CD56(bright) NK regulation of T cells via NKp44 and NKp46. Clin Exp Immunol, 200(3), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13422

[89] Li Z, Lim WK, Mahesh SP, Liu B, & Nussenblatt RB. (2005). Cutting edge: in vivo blockade of human IL-2 receptor induces expansion of CD56(bright) regulatory NK cells in patients with active uveitis. J Immunol, 174(9), 5187-5191. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5187

[90] Lee M, Bell CJM, Rubio Garcia A, Godfrey L, Pekalski M, Wicker LS, et al. (2023). CD56(bright) natural killer cells preferentially kill proliferating CD4(+) T cells. Discov Immunol, 2(1), kyad012. https://doi.org/10.1093/discim/kyad012

[91] Gumá M, Angulo A, Vilches C, Gómez-Lozano N, Malats N, & López-Botet M. (2004). Imprint of human cytomegalovirus infection on the NK cell receptor repertoire. Blood, 104(12), 3664-3671. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-05-2058

[92] Chen J, Ren E, Tao Z, Lu H, Huang Y, Li J, et al. (2025). Orchestrating T and NK cells for tumor immunotherapy via NKG2A-targeted delivery of a de novo designed IL-2Rβγ agonist. Drug Deliv, 32(1), 2482195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2025.2482195

[93] Unger ML, Hokland M, Basse PH, Nannmark U, & Johansson BR. (1997). High dose IL-2-activated murine natural killer (A-NK) cells accumulate glycogen and granules, lose cytotoxicity, and alter target cell interaction in vitro. Scand J Immunol, 45(6), 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3083.1997.d01-437.x

[94] Tiemessen MM, Jagger AL, Evans HG, van Herwijnen MJ, John S, & Taams LS. (2007). CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induce alternative activation of human monocytes/macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104(49), 19446-19451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706832104

[95] Moore KW, de Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL, & O'Garra A. (2001). Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol, 19, 683-765. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683

[96] Zhang X, Miao M, Zhang R, Liu X, Zhao X, Shao M, et al. (2022). Efficacy and safety of low-dose interleukin-2 in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 7(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00887-2

[97] Xue R, Li G, Zhou Y, Wang B, Xu Y, Zhao P, et al. (2024). Efficacy and safety of low-dose interleukin 2 in the treatment of moderate-to-severe bullous pemphigoid: A single center perspective-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol, 91(6), 1113-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.08.033

[98] Li ZG, He J, & Miao M. (2023). Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: facts and hopes. Sci. Bull., 68(1), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.12.024

[99] Malek TR. (2008). The biology of interleukin-2. Annu Rev Immunol, 26, 453-479. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090357

[100] Lykhopiy V, Malviya V, Humblet-Baron S, & Schlenner SM. (2023). "IL-2 immunotherapy for targeting regulatory T cells in autoimmunity". Genes Immun, 24(5), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-023-00221-y

[101] Shevach EM. (2009). Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity, 30(5), 636-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.010

[102] Panduro M, Benoist C, & Mathis D. (2016). Tissue Tregs. Annu Rev Immunol, 34, 609-633. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095948

[103] Klatzmann D, & Abbas AK. (2015). The promise of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol, 15(5), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3823

[104] Castela E, Le Duff F, Butori C, Ticchioni M, Hofman P, Bahadoran P, et al. (2014). Effects of low-dose recombinant interleukin 2 to promote T-regulatory cells in alopecia areata. JAMA Dermatol, 150(7), 748-751. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.504

[105] Dong S, Hiam-Galvez KJ, Mowery CT, Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Esensten JH, et al. (2021). The effect of low-dose IL-2 and Treg adoptive cell therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. JCI Insight, 6(18). https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.147474

[106] Lim TY, Perpinan E, Londono MC, Miquel R, Ruiz P, Kurt AS, et al. (2023). Low dose interleukin-2 selectively expands circulating regulatory T cells but fails to promote liver allograft tolerance in humans. J Hepatol, 78(1), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.035

[107] Le Duff F, Bouaziz JD, Fontas E, Ticchioni M, Viguier M, Dereure O, et al. (2021). Low-Dose IL-2 for Treating Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata: A 52-Week Multicenter Prospective Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing its Impact on T Regulatory Cell and NK Cell Populations. J Invest Dermatol, 141(4), 933-936.e936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.08.015

[108] Humrich JY, Cacoub P, Rosenzwajg M, Pitoiset F, Pham HP, Guidoux J, et al. (2022). Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy in active systemic lupus erythematosus (LUPIL-2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised and placebo-controlled phase II trial. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 81(12), 1685-1694. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-222501

[109] Koreth J, Kim HT, Jones KT, Lange PB, Reynolds CG, Chammas MJ, et al. (2016). Efficacy, durability, and response predictors of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood, 128(1), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-02-702852

[110] Farooq A, Trehan S, Singh G, Arora N, Mehta T, Jain P, et al. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Low-Dose Interleukin-2 (IL-2) Therapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Clinical Applications. Cureus, 16(9), e68748. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68748

[111] Malek TR, & Bayer AL. (2004). Tolerance, not immunity, crucially depends on IL-2. Nat Rev Immunol, 4(9), 665-674. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1435

[112] Todd JA, Evangelou M, Cutler AJ, Pekalski ML, Walker NM, Stevens HE, et al. (2016). Regulatory T Cell Responses in Participants with Type 1 Diabetes after a Single Dose of Interleukin-2: A Non-Randomised, Open Label, Adaptive Dose-Finding Trial. PLoS Med, 13(10), e1002139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002139

[113] Miao M, Xiao X, Tian J, Zhufeng Y, Feng R, Zhang R, et al. (2021). Therapeutic potential of targeting Tfr/Tfh cell balance by low-dose-IL-2 in active SLE: a post hoc analysis from a double-blind RCT study. Arthritis Res. Ther., 23(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02535-6

[114] He J, Zhang X, Wei Y, Sun X, Chen Y, Deng J, et al. (2016). Low-dose interleukin-2 treatment selectively modulates CD4(+) T cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Med., 22(9), 991-993. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4148

[115] Humrich JY, & Riemekasten G. (2019). Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Rheumatol, 31(2), 208-212. https://doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000575

[116] von Spee-Mayer C, Siegert E, Abdirama D, Rose A, Klaus A, Alexander T, et al. (2016). Low-dose interleukin-2 selectively corrects regulatory T cell defects in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 75(7), 1407-1415. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207776

[117] Hu FY, Wang J, Zhang SX, Su R, Yan N, Gao C, et al. (2021). Absolute reduction of peripheral regulatory T cell in patients with relapsing polychondritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 39(3), 487-493. https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qndtvt

[118] Rosenzwajg M, Salet R, Lorenzon R, Tchitchek N, Roux A, Bernard C, et al. (2020). Low-dose IL-2 in children with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes: a Phase I/II randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study. Diabetologia, 63(9), 1808-1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05200-w

[119] Saadoun D, Rosenzwajg M, Joly F, Six A, Carrat F, Thibault V, et al. (2011). Regulatory T-cell responses to low-dose interleukin-2 in HCV-induced vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med., 365(22), 2067-2077. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1105143

[120] Wang D, Fu B, Shen X, Guo C, Liu Y, Zhang J, et al. (2021). Restoration of HBV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses by sequential low-dose IL-2 treatment in non-responder patients after IFN-alpha therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 6(1), 376. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00776-0

[121] Zhou X, Wang Y, Huang B, Feng R, Zhou X, Li C, et al. (2023). Dynamics of T follicular helper cells in patients with rheumatic diseases and subsequent antibody responses in a three-dose immunization regimen of CoronaVac. Immunology, 168(1), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13572

[122] Zhang B, Sun J, Wang Y, Ji D, Yuan Y, Li S, et al. (2021). Site-specific PEGylation of interleukin-2 enhances immunosuppression via the sustained activation of regulatory T cells. Nat. Biomed. Eng., 5(11), 1288-1305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00797-8

[123] Levin AM, Bates DL, Ring AM, Krieg C, Lin JT, Su L, et al. (2012). Exploiting a natural conformational switch to engineer an interleukin-2 'superkine'. Nature, 484(7395), 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10975

[124] Sockolosky JT, Trotta E, Parisi G, Picton L, Su LL, Le AC, et al. (2018). Selective targeting of engineered T cells using orthogonal IL-2 cytokine-receptor complexes. Science, 359(6379), 1037-1042. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar3246

[125] Horwitz DA, Kim D, Kang C, Brion K, Bickerton S, & La Cava A. (2025). CD2-targeted nanoparticles encapsulating IL-2 induce tolerogenic Tregs and TGF-β-producing NK cells that stabilize Tregs for long-term therapeutic efficacy in immune-mediated disorders. Front Immunol, 16, 1587237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1587237

[126] Koh B, Oz STG, Sato R, Nguyen HN, Dunlap G, Mahony C, et al. (2025). Functional and dysfunctional T regulatory cell states in human tissues in RA and other autoimmune arthritic diseases. bioRxiv, 10.1101/2025.09.23.677874. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.677874

[127] Raposo A, Paço S, Ângelo-Dias M, Rosmaninho P, Almeida ARM, & Sousa AE. (2025). The distinctive signature of regulatory CD4 T cells committed in the human thymus. Front Immunol, 16, 1553554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1553554

[128] Cheng Z, Wang LJ, Honaker Y, Cincotta SA, Page CE, Vollhardt S, et al. (2025). Transcriptional fingerprinting of regulatory T cells: ensuring quality in cell therapy applications. Front Immunol, 16, 1602172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1602172

[129] Arroyo-Olarte RD, Flores-Castelán JC, Armas-López L, Escobedo G, Terrazas LI, Ávila-Moreno F, et al. (2024). Targeted Demethylation of FOXP3-TSDR Enhances the Suppressive Capacity of STAT6-deficient Inducible T Regulatory Cells. Inflammation, 47(6), 2159-2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-024-02031-4

[130] Kressler C, Gasparoni G, Nordström K, Hamo D, Salhab A, Dimitropoulos C, et al. (2020). Targeted De-Methylation of the FOXP3-TSDR Is Sufficient to Induce Physiological FOXP3 Expression but Not a Functional Treg Phenotype. Front Immunol, 11, 609891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.609891

[131] Xu K, Liu Q, Wu K, Liu L, Zhao M, Yang H, et al. (2020). Extracellular vesicles as potential biomarkers and therapeutic approaches in autoimmune diseases. J Transl Med, 18(1), 432. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02609-0

[132] Feng R, Xiao X, Huang B, Zhang K, Zhang X, Li Z, et al. (2024). Predictive biomarkers for low-dose IL-2 therapy efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinical analysis. Arthritis Res Ther, 26(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03388-5

[133] Friedberg JW, Neuberg D, Gribben JG, Fisher DC, Canning C, Koval M, et al. (2002). Combination immunotherapy with rituximab and interleukin 2 in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J Haematol, 117(4), 828-834. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03535.x

[134] Zhou H, Zhao X, Zhang R, Miao M, Pei W, Li Z, et al. (2023). Low-dose IL-2 mitigates glucocorticoid-induced Treg impairment and promotes improvement of SLE. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01350-6

[135] Cases M, Ritter N, Rincon-Arevalo H, Kroh S, Adam A, Kirchner M, et al. (2025). Novel non-coding FOXP3 transcript isoform associated to potential transcriptional interference in human regulatory T cells. RNA Biol, 22(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2025.2502719

[136] Ramón-Vázquez A, Flood P, Cashman TL, Patil P, & Ghosh S. (2025). T lymphocyte plasticity in chronic inflammatory diseases: The emerging role of the Ikaros family as a key Th17-Treg switch. Autoimmun Rev, 24(3), 103735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103735

[137] Lu Y, & Man XY. (2025). Diversity and function of regulatory T cells in health and autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun, 151, 103357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103357

[138] Bothur E, Raifer H, Haftmann C, Stittrich AB, Brüstle A, Brenner D, et al. (2015). Antigen receptor-mediated depletion of FOXP3 in induced regulatory T-lymphocytes via PTPN2 and FOXO1. Nat Commun, 6, 8576. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9576

[139] Long SA, Cerosaletti K, Wan JY, Ho JC, Tatum M, Wei S, et al. (2011). An autoimmune-associated variant in PTPN2 reveals an impairment of IL-2R signaling in CD4(+) T cells. Genes Immun, 12(2), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1038/gene.2010.54

[140] Lin JX, Ge M, Liu CY, Holewinski R, Andresson T, Yu ZX, et al. (2024). Tyrosine phosphorylation of both STAT5A and STAT5B is necessary for maximal IL-2 signaling and T cell proliferation. Nat Commun, 15(1), 7372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50925-6

[141] Santarlasci V, Mazzoni A, Capone M, Rossi MC, Maggi L, Montaini G, et al. (2017). Musculin inhibits human T-helper 17 cell response to interleukin 2 by controlling STAT5B activity. Eur J Immunol, 47(9), 1427-1442. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201746996

[142] Li Y, Lin D, Chen J, Zhang W, Jin H, Feng S, et al. (2025). Alkaline phosphatase-responsive hydrogel for efficient management of autoimmune intraocular inflammation. J Control Release, 387, 114229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114229

[143] Wahbi M, Wen Y, Kontopoulou M, & De France KJ. (2025). Modification of cellulose nanocrystals with epoxidized canola oil for enhancing interfacial compatibility with poly(lactic acid). Carbohydr Polym, 370, 124471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.124471

[144] Shin H, Kang S, Won C, & Min DH. (2023). Enhanced Local Delivery of Engineered IL-2 mRNA by Porous Silica Nanoparticles to Promote Effective Antitumor Immunity. ACS Nano, 17(17), 17554-17567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c06733

[145] Jeon EY, Choi DS, Choi S, Won JY, Jo Y, Kim HB, et al. (2023). Enhancing adoptive T-cell therapy with fucoidan-based IL-2 delivery microcapsules. Bioeng Transl Med, 8(1), e10362. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10362

[146] Wang J, Zhou L, & Liu B. (2020). Update on disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of primary Sjögren's syndrome. Int J Rheum Dis, 23(6), 723-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.13839

[147] Streckfus C, Bigler L, Navazesh M, & Al-Hashimi I. (2001). Cytokine concentrations in stimulated whole saliva among patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome, secondary Sjögren's syndrome, and patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome receiving varying doses of interferon for symptomatic treatment of the condition: a preliminary study. Clin Oral Investig, 5(2), 133-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840100104

[148] Zhao Z, Zhang X, Su L, Xu L, Zheng Y, & Sun J. (2018). Fine tuning subsets of CD4(+) T cells by low-dosage of IL-2 and a new therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases. Int Immunopharmacol, 56, 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2018.01.042

[149] Villani AC, Sarkizova S, & Hacohen N. (2018). Systems Immunology: Learning the Rules of the Immune System. Annu Rev Immunol, 36, 813-842. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053035

[150] Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly YM, et al. (2013). The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science, 341(6145), 569-573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241165

[151] Verra N, Jansen R, Groenewegen G, Mallo H, Kersten MJ, Bex A, et al. (2003). Immunotherapy with concurrent subcutaneous GM-CSF, low-dose IL-2 and IFN-alpha in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer, 88(9), 1346-1351. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600915

[152] Zhao XY, Zhao XS, Wang YT, Chen YH, Xu LP, Zhang XH, et al. (2016). Prophylactic use of low-dose interleukin-2 and the clinical outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A randomized study. Oncoimmunology, 5(12), e1250992. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2016.1250992

[153] Faridar A, Gamez N, Li D, Wang Y, Boradia R, Thome AD, et al. (2025). Low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized clinical trial. Alzheimers Res Ther, 17(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01791-x

[154] Bensimon G, Leigh PN, Tree T, Malaspina A, Payan CA, Pham HP, et al. (2025). Efficacy and safety of low-dose IL-2 as an add-on therapy to riluzole (MIROCALS): a phase 2b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 405(10492), 1837-1850. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00262-4

[155] Tong B, Leong SG, Jian T, Niu G, Gai Y, Meng X, et al. (2024). Site-specific pegylated IL2 mutein with biased IL2 receptor binding for cancer immunotherapy. Int Immunopharmacol, 136, 112359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112359

[156] Karakus U, Sahin D, Mittl PRE, Mooij P, Koopman G, & Boyman O. (2020). Receptor-gated IL-2 delivery by an anti-human IL-2 antibody activates regulatory T cells in three different species. Sci. Transl. Med., 12(574). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abb9283

[157] Chen X, Wang L, Liu Q, Jia J, Liu Y, Zhang W, et al. (2014). Polycation-decorated PLA microspheres induce robust immune responses via commonly used parenteral administration routes. Int Immunopharmacol, 23(2), 592-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2014.10.010

[158] Khoryati L, Pham MN, Sherve M, Kumari S, Cook K, Pearson J, et al. (2020). An IL-2 mutein engineered to promote expansion of regulatory T cells arrests ongoing autoimmunity in mice. Sci Immunol, 5(50). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aba5264

Peer-review Terminology

Identity transparency: Single anonymized

Reviewer interacts with: Editor

Details

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Publication History

Received 2025-10-23
Accepted 2026-01-15
Published 2026-03-10